老年慢性阻塞性肺病的临床护理对策探讨

Discussion on Clinical Nursing Strategies for Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

目的探讨老年慢性阻塞性肺病的临床护理对策分析。方法方便选取2016年1月—2018年1月60例老年慢性阻塞性肺病患者,随机数字表法分组,对照组施行常规化护理干预,实验组应用舒适护理干预。比较效果。结果实验组老年慢性阻塞性肺病患者满意度100.00%高于对照组,(χ~2=10.000,P<0.05)护理后实验组肺功能相应检测指标、生活质量指标优于对照组,(t=5.233、8.133,P<0.05)。实验组住院的所需时间、老年慢性阻塞性肺病知识认知、治疗的配合度分别为(8.56±0.21)d、(96.21±3.44)分、(96.76±3.65)分优于对照组(t=6.923、7.044、8.232,P<0.05);实验组呼吸衰竭等老年慢性阻塞性肺病并发症发生率6.67%低于对照组30.00%(χ~2=9.422,P<0.05)。结论舒适护理干预在老年慢性阻塞性肺病护理中的应用效果确切。

Objective To analyze the clinical nursing strategies for elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods Sixty elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonaiy disease from January 2016 to January 2018 were convenient selected and randomly assigned to a randomized digital table. The control group received routine nursing intervention and the experimental group applied comfort nursing intervention, compare the results. Results In the experimental group, the satisfaction rate of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was 100.00% higher than that of the control group （X^2=10.000, P〈0.05）, the corresponding test indicators and quality of life indicators of the experimental group were better than the control group（t=5.233, 8.133, P〈0.05）. The time required for hospitalization in the experimental group, the knowledge of cognition and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly were （8.56±0.21）d, （96.21±3.44） points, and （96.76±3.65） points were better than the control group （t=6.923, 7.044, 8.232, P〈0.05）; the incidence of complication of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonaiy disease such as respiratory failure was 6.67% lower than that of the control group, 30.00%（X^2=9.422, P〈0.05）. Conclusion The application of comfortable nursing intervention in the treatment of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is exact.