不同血液净化方式对尿毒症患者生活质量的影响分析

Analysis of the Influence of Different Blood Purification Methods on the Quality of Life of Uremic Patients

目的对不同血液净化方式在尿毒症患者生活质量改善上的影响进行研究。方法方便选取该院2014年1月—2017年1月收治的96例进行血液净化治疗尿毒症患者,根据其血液净化方式不同分为两组,其中,观察组患者48例,以血液透析联合血液灌流进行治疗;对照组48例,采用常规血液透析治疗,观察对比两组患者的治疗效果及生活质量改善变化。结果观察组治疗有效率为93.8%,对照组为77.1%,观察组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=3.589,P<0.05),且观察组患者治疗后生活质量评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论血液透析联合血液灌流在尿毒症患者治疗中效果更为显著,能够有效改善提升患者的生活质量,值得临床进行推广应用。

Objective To study the effects of different blood purification methods on the improvement of quality of life in uremic patients. Methods 96 patients with uremia who underwent blood purification from January 2014 to January 2017 were convenient selected and enrolled. According to their blood purification methods, they were divided into two groups. A-lnong them, 48 patients in the observation group were treated with helnodialysis combined with blood perfusion. For the treatment, 48 patients in the control group were treated with routine helnodialysis. The therapeutic effects and quality of life of the two groups were compared. Results The effective rate was 93.8% in the observation group and 77.1% in the control group The obiervation group was significantly higher than the loutrol group,the difference was statistically signficant （χ^2= 3.589, P〈0.05）. The quality of life score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group. The difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Helnodialysis combined with helnoperfusion is more effective in the treatment of uremic patients, which can effectively ilnprove the quality of life of patients and is worthy of clinical application.