子宫颈扩张球囊引产的护理干预和护理效果

Nursing Intervention and Nursing Effect of Cervical Dilatation Balloon Induced Labor

目的对子宫颈扩张球囊引产者应用护理干预的效果进行分析。方法对该院2017年5月—2018年5月方便选择子宫颈扩张球囊进行引产114例孕产妇临床资料加以分析,且依据不同护理方法分为2组,将行常规护理57例孕产妇作为对照组,将于其基础上行护理干预57例孕产妇作为观察组,比较2组心理状态、产程和并发症情况。结果观察组抑郁、焦虑心理状态评分(33.23±1.11)分、(34.24±1.05)分均比对照组(50.40±2.23)分、(51.30±1.25)分低,比较差异均有统计学意义(t=52.039 9、78.898 3,P<0.05),且第一产程和总产程(4.34±0.15)h和(6.85±1.50)h均比对照组(6.60±2.41)h和(9.18±3.90)h短,比较差异有统计学意义(t=7.066 3、4.209 9,P<0.05);观察组总并发症率3.51%比对照组21.05%低,比较差异有统计学意义(χ~2=8.142 9,P<0.05)。结论对子宫颈扩张球囊引产者应用护理干预效果佳,能够改善其负性心理,缩短产程,且减少并发症的发生。

Objective To analyze the effect of nursing intervention on cervical dilatation balloon intubation. Methods The clinical data of 114 pregnant women who underwent cervical dilatation balloon in May 2017 to May 2018 were convenient selected and analyzed. According to different nursing methods, they were divided into two groups. 57 pregnant women were routinely treated as a control group, 57 pregnant women who underwent basic nursing interventions were used as observation group to compare the psychological status, labor and complications of the two groups. Results The scores of depression and anxiety state of the observation group （33.23±1.11）points and （34.24±1.05）points were lower than those of the control group （50.40±2.23）points and （51.30±1.25）points. The difference was statistically significant （t =52.039 9, 78.898 3, P〈0.05）, and the first stage of labor and total labor （4.34±0.15） h and （6.85±1.50） h were shorter than the control group （6.60±2.41）h and （9.18±3.90）h. The differences were statistically significant （t=7.066 3, 4.209 9, P〈0.05）. The total complication rate of the observation group was 3.51% lower than that of the control group （21.05%）. The difference was statistically significant （χ^2= 8.142 9, P〈0.05）. Conclusion The application of nursing intervention to cervical dilatation balloon inducers is effective, which can improve their negative psychology, shorten the labor process and reduce the occurrence of complications.