期刊文献+

急性阑尾炎经腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗的临床效果对比分析 被引量:8

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Effects of Laparoscopic Surgery and Traditional Open Surgery for Acute Appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析急性阑尾炎患者在腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗中的临床效果对比。方法方便选取2016年1月—2018年1月期间该院急性阑尾炎患者189例(实施信封随机分组模式)。分别给予传统开腹手术、腹腔镜手术治疗,对比2组手术相关指标情况、并发症发生情况、生活质量评分。结果观察组手术时间为(30.12±5.97)min、术中出血量为(15.42±2.22)mL、下床活动时间为(25.57±4.87)h、平均住院时间为(5.54±1.02)d,数据与对照组数据之间进行比较,差异有统计学意义(t=10.550 7,P=0.000 1;t=27.826 1,P=0.000 1;t=36.876 2,P=0.000 1;t=24.240 5,P=0.000 1);观察组并发症发生例数有3例,对照组发生例数有14例,2组数据之间进行比较,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=20.199 2,P=0.000 1);观察组心理功能为(88.45±3.98)分、躯体功能为(89.24±3.35)分、社会功能为(89.98±4.51)分、物质生活为(91.03±3.75)分,数据明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=26.690 6,P=0.000 1;t=31.695 5,P=0.000 1;t=29.085 1,P=0.000 1;t=34.095 6,P=0.000 1)。结论急性阑尾炎患者在腹腔镜手术治疗中获得了较佳的临床效果,可推广。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic surgery and traditional open surgery in patients with acute appendicitis. Methods A total of 189 patients with acute appendicitis in the hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were enrolled conveniently. The patients were treated with traditional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery, and the results of the two groups of surgery, complications, and quality of life were compared. Results The operation time of the observation group was (30.12±5.97)rain, the intraoperative blood loss was (15.42±2.22)mL, the time of getting out of bed was (25.57±4.87)h, and the average hospitalization time was (5.54±1.02)d. Compared with the control data, the difference was significant (t=10.550 7, P=0.000 1; t=27.826 1, P=0.000 1; t=36.876 2, P=0.000 1; t=24.240 5 , P=0.000 1); There were 3 cases of complications in the observation group and 14 cases in the control group. There were significant differences between the two groups. The (X^2=20.199 2, P=0.000 1); The psychological function of the observation group was (88.45±3.98) points, the body function was (89.24±3.35)points, the social function was (89.98±4.51)points, and the material life was (91,03±3,75)points. The data was significantly higher than the control group(t=26.690 6, P=0.000 1; t=31.695 5, P=0.000 1; t=29.085 1, P=0.000 1; t=34.095 6, P=0.000 1). Conclusion Patients with acute appendicitis have obtained better clinical results in laparoscopic surgery and can be promoted.
作者 谢伟 李飞 XIE Wei;LI Fei(Department of General Surgery,Jurong People's Hospital,Zhenjiang,Jiangsu Province,212400 China)
出处 《中外医疗》 2018年第27期97-98,104,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 急性阑尾炎 腹腔镜手术 传统开腹手术 临床效果 对比观察 Acute appendicitis Laparoscopic surgery Traditional open surgery Clinical effects Comparative observation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献41

  • 1杨庆堂,姚干,李宇洲.腹腔镜及开腹手术治疗小儿急性阑尾炎疗效比较[J].第四军医大学学报,2006,27(2):100-100. 被引量:25
  • 2Eom JM, Hong JH, Jeon SW, et al. Safety and clinical efficacyof laparoscopic appendectomy for pregnant women with acuteappendicitis. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2012,41(2):82-86.
  • 3Hannan MJ, Hoque MM, Begum LN. Laparoscopic appendectomyin pregnant women: experience in Chittagong, Bangladesh. World JSurg, 2012^6(4):767-770.
  • 4Jeong JS, Ryu DH, Yun HY, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy isa safe and beneficial procedure in pregnant women. Surg LaparoacEndosc Percutan Tech, 2011,21(1):24-27.
  • 5Tsao KJ,St Peter SD,Valusek PA. Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children:Comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach[J].{H}Journal of Pediatric Surgery,2007,(06):939-942.
  • 6王国辉.腹腔镜用于急性阑尾炎治疗的发展、研究现状观察[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2011,16(9):339—342.
  • 7马世涛.腹腔镜手术用于急性阑尾炎治疗的优势及先进性剖析[J].生物医学工程学进展,2014,29(2):343-347.
  • 8李园园.腹腔镜手术与传统手术治疗急性阑尾炎的优劣比较观察[J].中国实用医药,2012,7(24):314-315.
  • 9陈建洪.中药辅助腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效及安全性观察[J].中国当代医药,2013,13(7):430-433.
  • 10范文婷.腹腔镜与传统外科手术治疗急性阑尾炎的近、远期疗效比较观察[J].中国普通外科杂志,2011,12(9):291-295.

共引文献70

同被引文献44

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部