1Delauey, J. T,&Huselid, M. A. 1996. The impact of human management practices on perceptions of organizational performance.Academy of Management Journal, 39(4):949-969.
2Delery, J. E, &Doty, D. H. 1996. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Test of universalistic, contingency, and contigurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802 - 835.
3Dyer, I, and Reeves, T. 1995. HR strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go? International Journational of Human Resource management, 6: 3, 656-670.
4Gerhart, B, & Milkovich, G. T. 1990. Organizational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33:663 - 691.
5Gomez - Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. 1992. Compensation,organizationa strategy, and firm performance. Cincinnati: South-western.
6Guthrie, J. 2001. High - involvement work practices,turnover and productivity: evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44:180 - 192.
7Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38:635 -672.
8Huselid, M. A. and Becker, B. E. 2000. Comment on measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates? Personnel Psychology, 53, 835 - 854.
9Abowd, J. M. 1990. Does performance - based managerial compensation affect corporate performance? Industral and Labor Relations Review, 43:52 - 73.
10Arthur, J. B. 1992. The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills. Industrial and labor Relations Review, 45:488 - 506.
