期刊文献+

基于CoVaR动态模型的我国金融机构系统性风险分析 被引量:10

Analysis on Chinese Financial Institutions’ Systemic Risk Based on CoVaR Dynamic Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章利用CoVaR动态模型对我国35家上市金融机构的系统性风险贡献进行动态估计及分析,揭示了金融机构特征因素对其未来系统性风险贡献的影响。实证结果发现,银行业金融机构的系统性风险贡献最大,证券业金融机构的贡献最小;系统性风险贡献越大的金融机构,其风险贡献的波动也越大;金融机构的规模越大,其未来的系统性风险贡献越小;金融机构的在险价值越大、杠杆率越高、股票收益的波动越大,其未来的系统性风险贡献越大。 This paper uses the CoVaR dynamic model to dynamically estimate and analyze the systemic risk contribution of 35 listed financial institutions in China,and reveals the impact of financial institutions' characteristic factors on their future systemic risk contribution. The empirical findings are as follows: banks have the largest systemic risk contribution, and security companies the smallest; The greater the contribution of systemic risk, the greater the volatility of the contribution; the larger the size of a financial institution, the smaller its contribution to systemic risk in the future; the greater the risk value of financial institutions,the higher the leverage ratio and the volatility of stock returns, the greater the contribution of systemic risk in the future.
作者 黄玮强 郭慧敏 庄新田 Huang Weiqiang;Guo Huimin;Zhuang Xintian(School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110167,China)
出处 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第19期162-165,共4页 Statistics & Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71771042 71371044) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(18YJCZH224)
关键词 金融机构 系统性风险 CoVaR 分位数回归 financial institution systemic risk CoVaR quantile regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献70

  • 1范小云,王道平,方意.我国金融机构的系统性风险贡献测度与监管——基于边际风险贡献与杠杆率的研究[J].南开经济研究,2011(4):3-20. 被引量:154
  • 2赵进文,韦文彬.基于MES测度我国银行业系统性风险[J].金融监管研究,2012(8):28-40. 被引量:35
  • 3马君潞,范小云,曹元涛.中国银行间市场双边传染的风险估测及其系统性特征分析[J].经济研究,2007,42(1):68-78. 被引量:231
  • 4Angelini, P. , Maresca, G.. and Russo, D. 1996, "Systemic Risk in the Netting System", Journal of Banking and Fi- nance, No. 20, pp. 853 - 868.
  • 5Adrian T. and M. Brunnermeier,2009, "CoVaR", Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Princeton University, FRB of New York Staff Report, No. 348.
  • 6Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2010, "Global systemically important banks: Assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement".
  • 7Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2011, "A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking sys- tem".
  • 8M Bl-varg and P Nimander, 2002, "Interbank Exposures and Systemic Risk ", Economic Review, No. 2, pp. 19 -45.
  • 9CraigH. Furfine, 2003, "Interbank Exposures : Quantifying the Risk of Contagion", Journal of Money, Credit and Bank- ing, 35(1), pp. 111 -128.
  • 10Cohen, Hugh, and W. Roberds, 1993, "Towards the Systematic Measurement of Systemic Risk", Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Paper, pp. 14-93.

共引文献276

同被引文献117

引证文献10

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部