期刊文献+

《儿科阿奇霉素注射使用的快速建议指南》推荐意见的外审调查 被引量:5

Rapid advice Guideline for Azithromycin for Injection in Pediatrics: recommendations external review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:总结《儿科阿奇霉素注射使用的快速建议指南》推荐意见外审调查的方法和步骤,以进一步修订推荐意见,为快速建议指南的外审提供方法学支持和实践经验。方法:对外审单位的临床医师、药师和护理人员等专家和患者家属进行电子问卷调查,对第二届福棠儿童医学发展论坛的高级职称参会专家进行纸质问卷调查。问卷包括基本信息和对指南形成的18条推荐意见的评估,包括赞同程度、表述清晰程度、临床可行程度和主观意见4个部分。指南制订小组根据一定的修订规则,讨论外审反馈意见,于定稿会对推荐意见进行修订。结果:共有86名外审专家和2名患者家属参与了指南外审,收到有效反馈4 762条,所有推荐意见的"赞同"、"清晰"或"可行"率均不小于80.0%,总体赞同程度为92.8%,总体表述清晰程度为96.3%,总体临床可行程度为92.7%,共收到78条主观建议。指南制订小组通过讨论,修订了4条推荐意见的表述,修改了1条推荐意见的主体内容,规范了措辞,未删减推荐意见,最终形成了18条推荐意见。结论:本研究对指南推荐意见外审的方法和步骤进行了详细的介绍,完成了推荐意见的进一步修订,并为快速建议指南的外审提供了方法学支持和实践经验。 OBJECTIVE To summarize the methods and steps of the recommendations external review of Rapid Advice Guideline for Azithromycin for Injection in Pediatrics,and provide methodological support and practical experience for the external review of the rapid advice guidelines. METHODS Physicians,clinical pharmacists,nursing staffs and patients' parents were investigated by electronic surveys,while experts above or equal to senior certificate from the forum were investigated by paper questionnaires. Basic information and assessment of the eighteen recommendations formed by the guidelines,including appreciations,clarity,feasibility and subjective opinions,were included into the questionnaires. The guideline panels discussed the results and revised recommendations according to the results of external review and rules. RESULTS A total of 86 external review experts and 2 patients' parents participated in the review. 4 762 effective feedbacks and 78 subjective suggestions were received. The overall appreciation degree of recommendations was 92. 8%,the overall clarity degree of recommendations was 96. 3%,and the overall feasibility degree of recommendations was 92. 7%. The rate of "approval","clear"and "feasible"of all recommendations was not less than 80. 0%. Finally,18 recommendations were developed through the panels' discussion by improving the formulation of 4 recommendations,revising the main content of 1 recommendation,standardizing the words without deletion. CONCLUSION The study introduces the methods and steps of the external review of the guideline recommendations in details,completes the further revision of the recommendations,and provides the methodological support and practical experience for the rapid advice guideline.
作者 周鹏翔 陈逸 徐保平 翟所迪 ZHOU Peng-xiang;CHEN Yi;XU Bao-ping;ZHAI Suo-di(Department of Pharmacy,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China;Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Department of Respiration,Beijing Children's Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100045,China;Institute for Drug Evaluation,Peking University Health Science Center,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第17期1773-1776,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
关键词 儿科 阿奇霉素 注射 快速建议指南 推荐意见 外审 pediatrics azithromycin injection rapid advice guideline recommendations external review
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1赵亚利,崔树起,彭晓霞.国内临床指南发展现状及国内外指南比较分析[J].中国全科医学,2005,8(7):593-596. 被引量:24
  • 2Chinese Medical Association and Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of HIV/AIDS in China (2005)[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2006(19):1589-1608. 被引量:23
  • 3Chinese Society of Hepatology,Chinese Medical Association and Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases,Chinese Medical Association.Guideline on prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in China (2005)[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(24):2159-2173. 被引量:42
  • 4World Health Organization. WHO handbook for guideline development. WHO, 2014.
  • 5Moynihan R, Oxman A, Lavis J, et al. Evidence-informed health policy: Using research to make health systems healthier. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. 2006.
  • 6WHO and Rapid Advice Guidelines: History and Future Directions. Available at: http://www.g-i-n.net/conference/past-conferences/10th-conference/monday/10-00-am-to-1-00-pm/norris-62.pdf.
  • 7World Health Organization. Rapid risk assessment of acute public health events, 2012.
  • 8Cunha A. Transparent development of WHO rapid advice guidelines: A useful approach. PLoS Med, 2007, 4(7): e245.
  • 9Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, et al. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev, 2012, 1(1): 10.
  • 10Watt A, Cameron A, Sturm L, et al. Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2008, 24(2): 133-139.

共引文献100

同被引文献51

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部