期刊文献+

早期放疗联合EP和EC方案治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的临床对比研究 被引量:5

Comparison study of early radiotherapy combined with EP and EC therapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究早期放疗联合EP(足叶乙甙+顺铂)或EC(足叶乙甙+卡铂)方案治疗局限期小细胞肺癌(LSCLC)的临床效果、安全性及对血清Ki-67和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平的影响。方法选取2013年1月~2014年12月解放军第九七医院放疗科收治的LSCLC患者70例,按随机数字表法分为EP组和EC组,每组各35例,EP组采用足叶乙甙+顺铂化疗,EC组采用足叶乙甙+卡铂化疗,21 d为1周期,共治疗6周期,同时在连续化疗2个周期后开始同步放疗,放化疗结束后评价近期临床疗效、不良反应,并对其生存期进行随访,同时采用酶联免疫吸附法检测两组治疗前后血清Ki-67和VEGF水平。结果 EP组有效率为71.43%,疾病控制率为85.71%;EC组有效率为68.57%,疾病控制率为80.00%,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。EP组患者总生存期(OS)为21.6个月,1年生存率为74.29%;EC组患者OS为22.1个月,1年生存率为77.14%,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。EP组骨髓抑制(中性粒细胞、血小板减少)发生率低于EC组(P <0.05),而在消化道反应、放射性肺炎、食管炎、肝功能异常等不良反应发生率较EC组差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。与治疗前比较,两组治疗后血清Ki-67和VEGF水平均明显降低,但EP组降低更明显(P <0.05)。结论早期放疗联合EP或EC方案对LSCLC患者近期疗效及生存情况的影响无明显差异,但早期放疗联合EP方案不良反应较轻,对血清Ki-67和VEGF水平影响更明显。 Objective To explore the clinical effect and security on early radiotherapy combined with EP or EC therapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC) and the influence on levels of the serum Ki-67 and VEGF. Methods A total of 70 cases with LSCLC in Department of Radiotherapy, the 97th Hospital of People's Liberation Army from January 2013 to December 2014 were selected, and they were divided into EP group and EC group by the random num- ber table method, with 35 cases in each group. The EP group was treated with VP-16 and DDP, while EC group was treated with and VP-16 and CBP. A treating course was 21 days, and both groups were treated for 6 courses. Concurrent radiotherapy was initiated after 2 courses of continuous chemotherapy. The clinical effect and adverse reactions were evaluated; the survival time was followed up. The levels of serum Ki-67 and VEGF before and after treatment were tested via ELISA. Results In EP group, the effective rate was 71.43%, and the disease control rate was 85.71%, while in EC group, they were 68.57%, 80.00% respectively, and there was no significant difference (P 〉 0.05). In EP group, the overall survival time (OS) was 21.6 months, the 1-year survival rate was 74.29%, while in EC group, the OS was 22.1 months, the 1-year survival rate was 77.14%, and there was no significant difference (P 〉 0.05). The adverse reactions rate of bone marrow suppression (neutrophile granulocyte, platelet decrease) was lower in EP group, while rate of gastrointestinal reaction, radiation pneumonitis, oesophagitis, abnormal liver function between the two groups had no significant difference (P 〉 0.05). Compared with the levels of Ki-67, VEGF before treatment, the levels of Ki-67, VEGF decreased remarkably in the two groups after treatment, while more obvious in EC group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference with the short-term effect in LSCLC between EP or EC therapy combined with early radiotherapy treatment, but EP therapy has fewer adverse reactions, with more obvious effect on suppressing the levels of serum Ki-67 and VEGF.
作者 马文青 张旭光 赵海泉 徐永茂 MA Wenqing;ZHANG Xuguang;ZHA O Haiquan;XU Yongmao(Department of Radiotherapy,the 97th Hospital of People's Liberation Army,Jiangsu Province,Xuzhou 221001,China;Department of Radiotherapy,Xuzhou Cancer Hospital,Jiangsu Province,Xuzhou 221001,China)
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2018年第29期96-99,共4页 China Medical Herald
基金 江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20151156)
关键词 局限期小细胞肺癌 EP EC 早期放疗 疗效 Lmited-stage small cell lung cancer EP EC Early radiotherapy Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献55

  • 1王金万,孙燕,刘永煜,于起涛,张沂平,李凯,朱允中,周清华,侯梅,管忠震,李维廉,庄武,王东林,梁后杰,秦凤展,卢辉山,刘晓晴,孙红,张燕军,王杰军,罗素霞,杨瑞合,涂远荣,王秀问,宋恕平,周静敏,游丽芬,王竞,姚晨.重组人血管内皮抑素联合NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC随机、双盲、对照、多中心Ⅲ期临床研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2005,8(4):283-290. 被引量:625
  • 2林丽珠,陶志广,周岱翰.WHO标准和RECIST在肺癌多中心疗效评价的比较[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(5):253-255. 被引量:41
  • 3周宗玫,王绿化,陈东福,吕纪马,张湘如,赫杰,殷蔚伯.临床Ⅰ、Ⅱ期小细胞肺癌手术与非手术综合治疗的临床研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(3):182-186. 被引量:9
  • 4World Health Organization (WHO). WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization, 1979.
  • 5Duffaud F, Therasse P. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. Bull Cancer, 2000, 87(12): 881-886.
  • 6Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2): 228-247.
  • 7James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1999, 91(6): 523-528.
  • 8Padhani AR, Ollivier L. The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol, 2001., 74(887): 983-986.
  • 9Awad J, Owrangi A, Villemaire L, et al. Three-dimensional lung tumor segmentation from x-ray computed tomography using sparse field active models. Med Phys, 2012, 39(2): 851-865.
  • 10Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, et al. Volumetric measure-ments of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol, 2004, 14(1): 86-92.

共引文献573

同被引文献63

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部