期刊文献+

Differential study of DCE-MRI parameters in spinal metastatic tumors, brucellar spondylitis and spinal tuberculosis 被引量:16

Differential study of DCE-MRI parameters in spinal metastatic tumors, brucellar spondylitis and spinal tuberculosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective: In the present study, spinal metastatic tumors, brucellar spondylitis and spinal tuberculosis werequantitatively analyzed using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to assess thevalue of DCE-MRI in the differential diagnosis of these diseases.Methods: Patients with brucellar spondylitis, spinal tuberculosis or a spinal metastatic tumor (30 cases of each)received conventional MRI and DCE-MRI examination. The volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep),extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve) and plasma volume fraction (Vp) of the diseased vertebral bodieswere measured on the perfusion parameter map, and the differences in these parameters between the patients werecompared.Results: For pathological vertebrae in cases of spinal metastatic tumor, brucellar spondylitis and spinaltuberculosis, respectively, the Ktrans values (median + quartile pitch) were 0.989±0.014, 0.720±0.011 and0.317±0.005 min-1; the Kep values were 2.898±0.055, 1.327±0.017 and 0.748±0.006 min-1; the Ve values were0.339±0.008, 0.542±0.013 and 0.428±0.018; the Vp values were 0.048±0.008, 0.035±0.004 and 0.028±0.009; thecorresponding H values were 50.25 (for Ktrans), 52.47 (for Kep), 48.33 (for Ve) and 46.56 (for Vp), and all differenceswere statistically significant (two-sided P〈0.05).Conclusions: The quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI has a certain value in the differential diagnosis of spinalmetastatic tumor, brucellar spondylitis and spinal tuberculosis. Objective: In the present study, spinal metastatic tumors, brucellar spondylitis and spinal tuberculosis werequantitatively analyzed using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to assess thevalue of DCE-MRI in the differential diagnosis of these diseases.Methods: Patients with brucellar spondylitis, spinal tuberculosis or a spinal metastatic tumor (30 cases of each)received conventional MRI and DCE-MRI examination. The volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep),extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve) and plasma volume fraction (Vp) of the diseased vertebral bodieswere measured on the perfusion parameter map, and the differences in these parameters between the patients werecompared.Results: For pathological vertebrae in cases of spinal metastatic tumor, brucellar spondylitis and spinaltuberculosis, respectively, the Ktrans values (median + quartile pitch) were 0.989±0.014, 0.720±0.011 and0.317±0.005 min-1; the Kep values were 2.898±0.055, 1.327±0.017 and 0.748±0.006 min-1; the Ve values were0.339±0.008, 0.542±0.013 and 0.428±0.018; the Vp values were 0.048±0.008, 0.035±0.004 and 0.028±0.009; thecorresponding H values were 50.25 (for Ktrans), 52.47 (for Kep), 48.33 (for Ve) and 46.56 (for Vp), and all differenceswere statistically significant (two-sided P〈0.05).Conclusions: The quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI has a certain value in the differential diagnosis of spinalmetastatic tumor, brucellar spondylitis and spinal tuberculosis.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Cancer Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第4期425-431,共7页 中国癌症研究(英文版)
基金 funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81460259)
关键词 Differential diagnosis dynamic contrast enhanced MRI spinal tuberculosis spinal metastatic tumor brucellar spondylitis Differential diagnosis dynamic contrast enhanced MRI spinal tuberculosis spinal metastatic tumor brucellar spondylitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献42

  • 1郁万江,杜湘珂.动态多层面MR T1W灌注成像鉴别良恶性肌骨病变[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(6):937-940. 被引量:8
  • 2于静红,陶美丽,尤壮志,王宇光.化脓性脊椎炎的MRI诊断[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2006,38(11):977-980. 被引量:2
  • 3Yu Y, Wang X, Du B, et al. Isolated atypical spinal tuberculosis mistaken for neoplasia: case report and literature review. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(Suppl 3): S302-S305.
  • 4Lang N, Su MY, Yu H J, et al. Differentiation of myeloma and metastatic cancer in the spine using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 31(8): 1285-1291.
  • 5Toffs PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1997, 7(1): 91-101.
  • 6Parker GJ, Roberts C, Macdonald A, et al. Experimentally- derived functional form for a population-averaged high- temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2006, 56(5): 993- 1000.
  • 7Go SW, Lee HY, Lim CH, et al. Atypical disseminated skeletal tuberculosis mimicking metastasis on PET-CT and MRI. Intern Med, 2012, 51(20): 2961-2965.
  • 8Zheng CY, Liu DX, Luo SW, et al. Imaging presentation highly manifested as tuberculosis in a case of spinal metastatic carcinoma. Orthopedics, 2011, 34(8): e436-e438.
  • 9Hillengass J, Zechmann C, Bauerle T, et al. Dynamic contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance imaging identifies a subgroup of patients with asymptomatie monoclonal plasma cell disease and pathologic microcirculation. Clin Cancer Res, 2009, 15(9): 3118-3125.
  • 10Saha A, Peck KK, Lis E, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion characteristics of hypervascular renal and hypovascular prostate spinal metastases: clinical utilities and implications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39(24): E1433-E1440.

共引文献89

同被引文献141

引证文献16

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部