期刊文献+

环境风险对中国煤电企业经济影响分析 被引量:2

Economic impact analysis of environmental risk on China's coal power enterprises
原文传递
导出
摘要 首先构建了煤电企业面临的环境风险分析总体框架,识别了关键的环境风险因素;然后以典型煤电机组为例,针对能效标准提高、环境保护税、全国碳市场、水资源税、产能过剩和非水可再生能源规划目标等风险因素设立综合情景,评估环境风险因素对煤电企业经济性的影响。结果表明各地区1 000 MW超超临界机组乐观情景及悲观情景的企业价值距合理回报预期企业价值相差小,而300 MW和600 MW亚临界机组因为能效水平低、经营成本高等原因在环境风险压力下企业价值偏离合理回报较多。随着环境风险严重程度的不断增加,有必要通过环境压力测试来识别与量化环境风险对煤电企业财务状况的影响,进而做出更加科学客观的中长期投资决策。 Firstly, the overall framework of environmental risk analysis faced by coal power enterprises was constructed, and key environmental risk factors were identified. Then taking a typical coal-fired power unit as an example, aiming at the risk factors such as increased energy efficiency standards, environmental protection tax, national carbon market, water resource tax, overcapacity and non-water renewable energy planning goals, a comprehensive scenario was set up to assess the impact of environmental risk factors on the economic performance of coal power enterprises. The results showed that the enterprise val- ue of optimistic and pessimistic scenarios of 1 000 MW ultra-supercritical units in different regions differed little from the ex- pected enterprise value of reasonable return. However, due to the low energy efficiency and high operating costs, under the pressure of environmental risk, the value of enterprises with 300 MW and 600 MW subcritical units deviated much from reasonable return. With the increasing severity of environmental risk, it is necessary to identify and quantify the impact of environmental risk on the financial situation of coal-fired power enterprises through environmental pressure testing, and then make more scientific and objective investment decisions in the medium and long term.
作者 袁家海 吴梦雅 Yuan Jiahai;Wu Mengya(North China Electric Power University,Beijing 102206,China)
机构地区 华北电力大学
出处 《煤炭经济研究》 2018年第9期34-39,共6页 Coal Economic Research
关键词 环境风险 压力测试 DCF模型 煤电企业 environmental risk stress test DCF model coal power enterprise
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1唐文江,任宇宁,李栗栎.国际银行业新资本协议压力测试情景设置探讨及对我国的借鉴[J].国际金融,2009(11):57-62. 被引量:3
  • 2Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Amendment to the capital accord to incorporate market risks [ EB/OL]. January 1996. (November 2005) [August 2009]. Available at : http://www. bis. org/publ/bcbs24. pdf.
  • 3Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervision [ EB/OL]. January 2009. (May 2009) [August 2009]. Available at : http://www. his. org/publ/bcbs155. pdf.
  • 4BERKOWITZ, JEREMY. A Coherent Framework for Stress- Testing [DB/OL] . FEDS Working Paper No. 99 -29, June 22, 1999. (January 04, 2000). [August 21, 2009]. Available at SSRN: http://ssm.com/abstract = 181931 .
  • 5UPIEC, PAUL H., The New Basel Capital Accord: The Devil Is in the (Calibration) Details [DB/OL] . IMF Working Paper, Vol. , pp. 1 -21, August 2001. [August 25, 2009]. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract =879850.
  • 6Committee on the Global Financial System (CGFS) . A survey of stress tests and current practice at major financial institutions[R]. 2001. Available at: http://www. bis. org/publ/cgfs18. pdf.
  • 7Committee on the Global Financial System (CGFS) . Stress Testing at Major Financial Institutions: Survey Results and Practice[R]. 2005. Available at: http://www.bis. org/publ/cgfs24.pdf.
  • 8Artzner, Philippe, Freddy Delbaen, Jean-Marc Eber, David Heath. Coherent Measures of Risk[J], Mathematical Finance, 1999, (9)3: 203-228.
  • 9JONES, M T, P HILBERS and G SLACK. Stress testing financial systems: what to do when the governor calls[R]. IMF Working paper, 2004.
  • 10International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank. Financial Sector Assessment Program- Review, Lessons, and Issues [R]. 2005.

共引文献167

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部