期刊文献+

面向网络外部性特征产品的供应链动态竞争策略研究 被引量:4

Dynamic Competition Strategy of Supply Chains with Network Externality Production
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当产品具有网络外部性的特征时,该产品的规模收益特征对利润、产品价格和需求等因素都会产生重大影响。首先,通过将网络规模建立为网络成本投入的微分方程,分别构建了分散与集中式决策下的动态供应链模型。其次,以供应链的利润最大化为前提,利用微分博弈导出生产量、批发价、零售价和投入努力值的最优策略。结论表明:在生命周期的前部分,集中决策情形的供应链系统利润和产品价格低于分散决策情形,但越往后,其价格和利润都将逐步超过分散决策情形,且差距越来越大。 The assumption of increasing and decreasing return of scale has a significant impact on profit, price and demand with network externality. First, the network size established by the cost of inputs of differential equations for the network is construeted under dynamic supply-chain models characterized by decentralized and centralized decision-making. By building differential equations for network size, which constitute a function of network investment, supply-chain models are developed. Secondly, to maximize supply-chain profits as a precondition, by solving differential games, the optimal value of policies regarding wholesale production, retail price, and effort rate is obtained. The results demonstrate that, in the first part of the life cycle, price and s upply-chain system profit under centralized decision-making situations are lower than those under deeentrafized decision-making. However, it is found that, as time passes, their price and profit will gradually exceed those of decentralized decision-making, and the gap between them will increase.
作者 颜锦江 郭春香 龚浩 YAN Jin-jiang;GUO Chun-xiang;GONG Hao(Business School,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610064,China)
机构地区 四川大学商学院
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第10期76-82,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71471123 71071102) 四川省软科学科技计划项目(2016ZR0042 2013ZR0018) 中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项(哲学社会科学)(skqy201768 skqy201324)
关键词 供应链 动态定价 寡头竞争 网络外部性 微分博弈 supply chain dynamic pricing duopolistic competition network externality differential game
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献53

  • 1夏晖,曾勇.不完全竞争环境下不对称企业技术创新战略投资[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):30-41. 被引量:26
  • 2《中国科学技术统计年鉴》.北京:统计出版社,2003.
  • 3Kamien M, Tauman Y. Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent [ J ]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986, 18(4) : 471-491.
  • 4Katz N L, Shapiro C. On the licensing of innovations[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1985, 16(4) : 504-520.
  • 5Rostoker M. A survey of corporate licensing[ J]. The Journal of Law and Technology, 1984, 24(2) : 59-92.
  • 6Wang X H. Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated coumot duopoly[J]. Journal of Economics and Business, 2002, 54 (2) : 253-266.
  • 7Antelo M. Licensing a non-drastic innovation under double informational asymmetry[J].Research Policy, 2003, 32 (3) : 367-390.
  • 8Fauli-Oller R, Sandonis J. Welfare reducing licensing[ J ]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2002, 41 (2) : 192-205.
  • 9Choi J, Thum M. Market structure and the timing of technology adoption with network externalities [ J ]. European Economic Review, 1998, 42(2) : 225-244.
  • 10Chamberlim E H. The theory of monopolistic competition [ M ]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1933.

共引文献51

同被引文献48

引证文献4

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部