摘要
曹道衡先生是"选学"研究大家,在现代《文选》学领域作出了卓越贡献。关于《文选序》研究,他提出需要重视萧统的皇太子身份对《文选》选录标准的影响,同时认为应综合《文选序》《答湘东王求文集》及《文选》收录作家作品的实际状况来检验《文选》一书的选录标准。关于《文选》成书研究,他首次指出《文选》大多篇章皆为魏晋以来公认的名作佳构,客观上挑战了学界主流观点"《文选》是再选本"之说。他不断完善对《文选》成书时间的研究,产生了广泛的学术影响。关于《文选》与钟嵘《诗品》、江淹《杂体诗》相互关系的研究,他指出既需关注共性又需关注个性的研究纲领。关于《文选》文本研究,曹道衡先生以其深厚学养和精到见识,在《文选》文献学的文本研究和文艺学的文本研究领域作出了重要贡献。他的精辟见解,至今仍对"选学"研究具有指导意义。
Cao Daoheng was the master of anthology research,and made an important contribution in the field of modern anthology.He suggested the important effect of Xiao Tong's prince identity on the standards of " Anthology".About the compiled " Anthology",he first pointed out that nearly most of the articles selected in the " Anthology" were well-known masterpieces since the Wei and Jin Period,challenging the mainstream point of view that the " Anthology" was a re-selected " Anthology".He also pointed out the principle that we should pay attention to both the universality and individuality of the research.Cao Daoheng had made great contributions in the text study of anthological philology and the text study of literary theory because of his profound knowledge and his unique opinion.
作者
王立群
WANG Li-qun(School of Chinese Studies , Henan University , Kafeng 475001, China)
出处
《江苏师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2018年第5期29-40,共12页
Journal of Jiangsu Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition