期刊文献+

胚胎单基因病诊断患者辅助生殖累积妊娠率低的原因初探 被引量:1

A preliminary study of low cumulative pregnancy rates in ART patients with pre-implantation genetic test for monogenetic
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胚胎植入前单基因病检测(PGT-M)患者辅助生殖累积妊娠率低的可能原因,为临床遗传咨询提供理论依据。方法回顾性分析我中心2016年7月至2017年6月期间的PGT-M患者,共31个促排卵周期,102枚胚胎,行高通量测序染色体筛查及单基因病诊断,为PGF-M组。同时收集同期的行胚胎植入前染色体非整倍性检测(PGT-A)患者,共90个周期,350枚胚胎,行高通量测序染色体筛查,为PGT-A组。将PGT-M组患者有效胚胎占比,从染色体筛查及单基因病诊断两个层面,分别与PGT-A组患者胚胎染色体筛查结果,以及单基因病孟德尔遗传规律预测结果比对分析。结果 PGT-M组与PGT-A组在女方平均年龄、平均Gn使用量、平均Gn使用天数、平均获卵数等临床资料无显著性差异(P>0.05);PGT-M组与PGT-A组染色体正常胚胎占比(45.74%vs.48.29%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);单基因病诊断完全正常的胚胎,实际占比显著小于理论占比(29.17%vs.42.19%)(P<0.05)。综合染色体筛查及单基因病诊断结果,PGT-M组患者有效胚胎占27.45%,其中完全正常胚胎占12.75%。结论 PGT-M患者胚胎由于较低的染色体整倍性概率及较高的单基因病致病概率,导致最终有效胚胎数较少,进而使得累积妊娠率偏低。 Objective: To explore the possible causes of low cumulative patients with pre imp theoretical basis for c pregnancy rates of gene defects (PGT assisted reproduction M),so as to provide Methods: The data of PGT M patients in our center from July 2016 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed,which included 31 ovulation induction cycles, 102 embryos through high throughput sequencing chromosome screening and monogenic disease diagnosis as PGT M group. At the same time, the patients with pre implantation chromosome aneuploidy test(PGT A)were collected, which included 90 cycles, 350 embryos through high throughput sequencing chromosome screening as PGT A group. The normal embryo percentage confirmed by embryo chromosome screening and single gene disease diagnosis in PGT M patients was compared with the normal embryo percentage confirmed by embryo chromosome screening in PGT A patients, and also compared with the prediction results according to Mendelian genetic law of monogenic diseases. Results: There were no significant differences in age, doses and days of Gn used, and number of oocytes retrieved between the PGT M group and the PGT A group(P〉0.05). There was no significant differencein percentage of normal embryonic chromosome(45.74% vs. 48.29%,P〉0.05). The actual percentage of completely normal embryos confirmed by monogenic diseases diagnosis was significantly less than the theoretical proportion (29.17% vs. 42.19%)(P 〈 0.05). Combined with the results of chromosome screening and single gene disease diagnosis, the effective embryos accounted for 27.45 --00 ,with 12.75% of fully normal embryos in PGT M patients. Conclusions: Due to the lower chromosome euploidy and the higher incidence of single gene disease, PGT M patients have less effective embryos,which lead to the low cumulative pregnancy rate.
作者 王珺 陈书强 张亨德 黄剑磊 李博 WANG Jun;CHEN Shu-qiang;ZHANG Heng-de;HUANG Jian-lei;LI Bo(Center for Reproductive Medicine,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Tang Du Hospital,the air force military medical university,Xi'an 710038)
出处 《生殖医学杂志》 CAS 2018年第11期1096-1100,共5页 Journal of Reproductive Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(31640056) 陕西省自然科学基金面上项目(2016JM8052)
关键词 胚胎单基因病诊断 累积妊娠率 临床遗传咨询 Embryonic single gene disease diagnosis Cumulative pregnancy rates Clinical genetic counseling
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1Brezina PR, Brezina DS, Kearns WG. Preimplantation genetic testing [J]. BMJ, 2012,345 : e5908.
  • 2SenGupta SB, Delhanty JD. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: recent triumphs and remaining challenges [J]. Expert Rev Mul Diagn, 2012, 12(6 ) : 585-592.
  • 3Ly KD, Agarwal A, Nagy ZP. Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo? [J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2011, 28(9 ) : 833-849.
  • 4Harper JC, Wilton L, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years cff data collection [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2012, 18(3):234-247.
  • 5Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 201 1, 17(4):454-466.
  • 6Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Mir P, et al. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: clinical results [J]. Fertil Steril, 2013.99 ( 4 ) : 1044-1048.
  • 7Goossens V, Harton G, Moutou C, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection Ⅸ: cycles from January to December 2006 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2007 [J]. Hum Reprod, 2009, 24 (8): 1786-1810.
  • 8Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, et al. Selection of single blastoeysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: resuhs from a randomized pilot study [J]. Mol Cytogenet, 2012, 5( 1 ) :24.
  • 9Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, et al. Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ hybridization [J]. Hum Reprod, 1995, 10(7 ) : 1923-1927.
  • 10Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approachl [J]. Hum Repro& 2010, 25(3 ) :575-577.

共引文献6

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部