广州市编辑功能性躯体症状与生存质量调查

Investigation on functional somatic symptoms and quality of life among editors in Guangzhou City

目的了解编辑的功能性躯体症状及其与健康相关的生活质量关系。方法运用患者健康问卷躯体症状群量表(PHQ-15)和世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)对广州市86名在职的编辑进行调查。结果 86名在职编辑的功能性躯体症状得分为7.16±5.43,其中28名(32.56%)编辑有中等程度以上的功能性躯体不适。不同性别、受教育水平编辑的功能性躯体症状得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。按照功能性躯体症状的得分高低分组,躯体功能症状重度组在生存质量的各领域均低于其他组,而躯体不适极轻度组的编辑生存质量的得分较高。Pearson相关分析表明,编辑功能性躯体不适与生存质量生理领域、心理领域、社会关系及环境领域呈负相关关系(均P<0.05)。结论在职编辑躯体不适应程度较高,性别及学历是编辑功能性躯体症状的主要影响因素。躯体症状不适应对编辑的生存质量有负面预测作用。

[Objective]To understand the functional somatic symptoms of editors and its relationship with health-related quality of life.[Methods]A total of 86 in-service editors were investigated by using the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 item（PHQ-15） and the World Health Organizatio n Quality of Life-BREF（ WHO QOL-BREF）.[Results]The score of functional somatic symptoms score in 8 6 editors was 7.16 ±5.43, w ith 28（32.56%） edito rs having functional somatic discomfort at moderate level or more. There were significant differences in functional somatic symptoms among different groups in sex and educational level（P〈0.05）. The editors were grouped according to the scores of functional somatic symptoms, the scores of quality of life in each dimension in severe group were lower than those in other groups, and the scores of quality of life in mild group were higher.Pearson correlation analysis showed that the functional somatic discomfort of editors was negatively correlated with life quality physiology field, psychological field, social relationship and environment（all P〈0.05）. [Conclusion]The status of somatic discomfort among editors is high, and gender and educational level are the main influencing factors of functional somatic symptoms in editors. The somatic discomfort has a negative predictive effect on editors＇ quality of life.