临床护理路径在支气管哮喘患者中的护理效果

Effects of CNP in patients with bronchial asthma

目的:观察临床护理路径在支气管哮喘患者中的护理效果。方法:选择100例支气管哮喘患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各50例。对照组给予常规护理,观察组给予临床护理路径。对比两组住院时间、护理满意度、健康知识掌握程度和半年内的复发率。结果:观察组住院时间明显短于对照组,护理满意度和健康知识达标率均明显高于对照组,半年内的复发率明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床护理路径用于支气管哮喘患者的护理效果优于常规护理效果。

Objective： To explore effects of clinical nursing pathway（CNP） in patients with bronchial asthma. Methods： 100 patients with bronchial asthma were selected as the study subjects, and they were divided into observation group（n=50） and control group（n=50） according to the order of admission. The control group received routine nursing, while the observation group was given the CNP. The hospitalization time, nursing satisfaction, health knowledge mastery and recurrence rate within half a year were compared between the two groups. Results： The hospitalization time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group. The nursing satisfaction degree and health knowledge standardreaching rate were significantly higher than those of the control group. The recurrence rate within half a year was significantly lower than that of the control group. All the differences were statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusions： The CNP is superior to the routine nursing in the patients with bronchial asthma.