期刊文献+

对中世纪“工业革命”论题的考察与评价

An Investigation into and Evaluation of the Thesis of Industrial Revolution of the Middle Ages
原文传递
导出
摘要 中世纪工业革命论者认为,以水磨为主的动力机器在中世纪后期被广泛使用,带来了显著的进步。而反对者指出,证据不足以支持革命论,动力磨的数量较少,产生的实际影响也有限。工业革命概念与18世纪英国产业运动联系紧密,并不适合说明中世纪的成就。综合考虑,本文认为最好放弃使用中世纪工业革命的说法。 The advocators of the industrial revolution of the Middle Ages considered that power machines, represented by water-mills, were widely utilized in the High Middle Ages, which facilitated some notable progress. But the opponents argued that evidences did not support such a statement, because the number of mills was relatively small and their actual effects were limited. The concept of industrial revolution has an inseparable connection with the industrial development in the 18th century UK, so it is not suitable to be used to explain the medieval accomplishment. It is better to reject the parlance of industrial revolution of the Middle Ages.
作者 吕天择 LU Tianze(Department of Philosophy,Peking University,Beijing,100871)
机构地区 北京大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第10期50-56,共7页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"世界科学技术通史研究"(项目编号:14ZDB017)
关键词 中世纪 工业革命 水磨 The Middle Ages Industrial revolution Water-mills
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献122

  • 1俞金尧.访谈英国史学家E·A·里格利[J].史学理论研究,2005(4):140-143. 被引量:5
  • 2奇波拉.《欧洲经济史》第1卷[M].商务印书馆,1988年版.第181页.
  • 3马克垚.《西欧封建经济形态研究》[M].人民出版社,1985年版.第313页.
  • 4克拉潘.《简明不列颠经济史》,范定九、王祖廉译,上海译文出版社,1980年,第166页.
  • 5Poole,A.,The Oxford History of England:From Domesday Book to Magna Carta,1087-1216,Oxford,1964,p.74.
  • 6Gross,C.,The Gild Merchant,v.Ⅰ,London,1967,p.108.
  • 7Hilton,R.H.,English and French Towns in Feudal Society,A Comparative Study,Cambridge,1992,p.69.
  • 8Miller,E.and Hatcher,J.,Medieval England:Towns,Commerce and Crafts,1086-1348,London,1995,p.100.
  • 9Postan,M.M.and Miller,E.eds.,The Cambridge Economic History of Europe,v.Ⅱ,p.679-681.
  • 10周宪文.《西洋经济史论集》第1辑,台湾银行经济研究室,1982年编印,第580页.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部