期刊文献+

共享决策干预对肝癌患者治疗决策满意度及希望水平的影响 被引量:38

Effect of shared decision-making intervention on satisfaction with medical decision-making and hope level of patients with liver cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨共享决策干预对肝癌患者治疗决策满意度和希望水平的影响。方法将接受治疗的早期原发性肝癌患者182例按住院时间分组,2017年4~7月收治的91例患者设为对照组,2017年8~11月收治的91例患者设为干预组。对照组按常规进行护理,干预组在常规护理基础上实施共享决策干预。于出院前1d采用决策参与满意度量表和希望水平量表评价干预效果。结果干预组决策参与满意度总分及各维度评分、希望水平总分及各维度评分显著高于对照组(均P<0.01)。结论共享决策干预可以提高肝癌患者决策参与满意度及主观幸福水平,有利于患者积极配合治疗,提高治疗效果。 Objective To explore the effect of shared decision intervention on satisfaction with medical decision-making and hope level of patients with liver cancer.Methods A total of 182 patients with early stage primary liver cancer were divided into two groups,with 91 patients admitted within April to July in 2017 as the control group,who received routine nursing care,and 91 patients admitted within August to November of 2017 as the intervention group,who additionally received shared decision-making intervention.The intervention effect was evaluated by using the Decision Participation Satisfaction Scale and the Herth Hope Index 1 dbefore discharge.Results The total score of decision making participation satisfaction and all the dimension scores,the total score of hope and all the dimension scores in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P〈0.01 for all).Conclusion Shared decision intervention can improve satisfaction and subjective well-being of patients with liver cancer,which helps patients actively cooperate with treatment and improve therapeutic effect.
作者 曹磊 曲兆伟 Cao Lei;Qu Zhaowei(Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery,Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150040,China)
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第18期32-35,共4页 Journal of Nursing Science
基金 黑龙江省卫生计生委科研课题(2017-124)
关键词 肝癌 共享决策 治疗决策 满意度 希望水平 护理 liver cancer shared decision-making medical decision-making satisfaction hope level nursing care
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献41

  • 1汪涛,叶任高,李惠群,杨锦屏,阮玉锯,余立群,朱兰英,沈清瑞,李希杰.慢性透析病人的生活质量[J].中华肾脏病杂志,1995,11(4):227-229. 被引量:55
  • 2贺意辉,余穗山,吕少芬,古英明.血液透析患者的心理健康水平及护理[J].实用护理杂志,1996,12(5):230-231. 被引量:40
  • 3Siege C A. Embracing the internet for progress in shared decision-making[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2007, 13 ( 2 ) : 1579-1580.
  • 4Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2005,20(6) : 531-535.
  • 5Degner L F, Sloan J A, Venkatesh P. The Control Pre- ferences Scale[J]. Can J Nurs Res,1997,29(3) :21-43.
  • 6Joosten E A, De Fuentes-Merillas L, de Weert G H, et al. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision- making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status [J]. Psychother Psychosom, 2008, 77 ( 4 ) : 219-226.
  • 7Ende J , Kazis L, Ash A, et al. Measuring patients'desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients pJ]. J Gen Intern Med,1989,4(1) :23-30.
  • 8Murray E, Pollack L, White M, et al. Clinical decision- making:patients' preferences and experiences[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2007,65 (2) : 189-196.
  • 9Fraenkel L, McGraw S. Participation in medical decision making: the patients' perspective [J]. Med Deeis Ma- king,2007,27(5) :533-538.
  • 10Janz N K, Wren P A, Copeland L A, et al. Patient-phy- sician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision[J]. J Clin Oncol,2004,22(15) : 3091-3098.

共引文献761

同被引文献346

引证文献38

二级引证文献224

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部