公安民警处置经济纠纷警情法律适用研究

Study on the Law Application of Public Security Police to deal with Economic Disputes

日常生活中，很多经济纠纷债权人不通过合法渠道救济，而简单粗暴采用私力救济手段，不仅侵害了公民的人身和财产权益，还扰乱了社会管理秩序。显然，公民以私力方式来实现的自我救济行为，为我国法律所禁止。存在民事纷争，并不构成当事人可以实施违法行为的正当理由。但公安民警时常对处置经济纠纷警情束手无策，苦于找不到法律适用，误认为现行法律不够用，本文以江苏省一起典型案件为例；分析法院判决公安机关行政不作为原因，从民法、行政法、刑法、程序法四个维度谈法律适用，引导基层民警如何用好用足法律，运用法治思维和法治方式分析问题、解决问题。

In daily life, many economic dispute creditors do not pass legal channels to remedy, but simple and rude use of private remedies, not only infringe upon the personal and property rights of citizens, but also disrupt the social management order. Obviously, the self-relief behaviors that citizens achieve in a private way are prohibited by our laws. The existence of civil disputes does not constitute a justification for the parties to commit illegal acts. However, the public security police often do nothing to deal with the economic disputes, and they can＇t find the law to apply. They mistakenly believe that the current law is not enough. This paper takes a typical case of Jiangsu Province as an example to analyze the court＇s decision on the administrative inaction of public security organs from civil law and administration. The four dimensions of Civil law, administrative law, criminal law, procedural law talk about the application of law, and guide grassroots civilian police how to use the law well, use the rule of law and the rule of law to analyze problems and solve problems.