期刊文献+

液体种类对剖宫产产妇术后并发症及满意度的影响

Effect of liquid type on postoperative complications and satisfaction of cesarean section puerperas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨液体种类对剖宫产术后产妇并发症及满意度的影响。方法将120例行剖宫产分娩产妇按入院顺序分为限制性胶体组(6%羟乙基淀粉130/0.4氯化钠注射液)和限制性晶体组(乳酸钠林格注射液),各60例。比较两组的剖宫产并发症发生情况及产妇治疗满意度。结果限制性胶体组术后并发症总发生率明显低于限制性晶体组(P<0.05)。限制性胶体组治疗满意度明显高于限制性晶体组(P<0.05)。结论在剖宫产手术中,限制性胶体干预效果显著优于限制性晶体,且限制性肢体可显著降低剖宫产并发症发生率,提高产妇治疗满意度。 Objective To explore the effect of liquid type on postoperative complications and satisfaction of cesareansection puerperas. Methods A total of 120 puerperas undergoing cesarean section were divided into restrictive colloidgroup (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 sodium chloride injection) and restrictive crystal group (sodium lactate ringer'sinjection) according to the order of admission, with 60 cases in each group. The incidences of cesarean sectioncomplications and maternal treatment satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The total incidence ofpostoperative complications in the restrictive colloid group was significantly lower than that in the restrictive crystal group(P 〈0.05). The treatment satisfaction rate of the restrictive colloid group was significantly higher than that in therestrictive crystal group (P 〈0.05). Conclusion In cesarean section, the intervention effect of restrictive colloid issignificantly better than that of restrictive crystal, and restrictive colloid can significantly decrease the incidence ofcesarean section complications and improve the treatment satisfaction of puerperas.
作者 吴丽莉 白红艳 WU Li-li;BAI Hong-yan(Women and Children's Hospital of Yan'an City,Yan'an 716000,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2018年第32期149-150,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 液体种类 剖宫产 限制性胶体 限制性晶体 liquid type cesarean section restrictive colloid restrictive crystal
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

  • 1翟桂荣.子痫前期病因学研究进展[J].北京医学,2005,27(8):485-487. 被引量:4
  • 2Ghuman M, Rohlandt D, Joshy G, etal. Post caesarean sec tion surgical site infection:rate and risk factors[J]. N Z Med J, 2011,124(1339) : 32-36.
  • 3Gong SP, Guo HX, Zhou HZ, et al. Morbidity and risk fac- tors for surgical site infection following cesarean section in Guangdong Province, China [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2012,38(3) :509-515.
  • 4闵鲲.剖宫产术后感染因素分析[J].中外健康文摘,2010,7(21):211-212.
  • 5Singh R, Kumar N, Jain A, et al. Spinal anesthesia for lower seg- ment cesarean section in patients with stable eclampsia[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2011, 23:202-206.
  • 6Aya AG, Vialles N, Tanoubi I, et al. Spinal anesthesia-induced hy- potension: a risk comparison between patients with severe pre- eclampsia and healthy women undergoing preterm eesarean delivery [J]. Anesth Analg, 2005, 101:869-875.
  • 7Santos AC, Birnbaeh DJ. Spinal anesthesia in the parturient with se- vere preeclampsia: time for reconsideration[J]. Anesth Analg, 2003, 97:621-622.
  • 8Aya AG, Mangin R, Vialles N, et al. Patients with severe preeclamp- sia experience less hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery than healthy parturients: A prospective cohort comparison[J]. Anesth Analg, 2003, 97:867-872.
  • 9Ghaffari S, Malaki M, Rezaeifar A, et al. Effect of peripheral edema on oscillometrie blood pressure measurement[J]. J Cardiovasc Tho- rac Res, 2014, 6:217-221.
  • 10Krahbendam I, Courtar DA, Janssen B J, et al. Blunted autonomic response to volume expansion in formerly preeclamptic women with low plasma volume[J]. Reprod Sei, 2009, 16:105-112.

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部