论清浙西词派关于柳永的评价

The West Zhejiang School's Views on Liu Yong's Works

活跃于清代词坛百余年之久的浙西词派,无论在词的创作还是欣赏上,都以"清空""骚雅"为最高标准。但涉及到历来被认为是俗词代表的柳永的评价时,则在其前期、中期、后期有一定的变化。主要表现为,词派前期代表人物尚能欣赏柳永词中部分风格作品的美感,中期代表人物主要批判其词俗的方面,后期代表人物则更多在婉约一脉的视角下对其进行评价。这些评价之变化,既是讨论柳永词在清代接受情况的重要材料,也反映了浙西词派词学主张在其前后期变化的趋势。

The West Zhejiang School, which was active in the ci circle for more than 100 years in the Qing Dynasty, applied its highest standard in ci appreciation and creation： qingkong （free, natural but full of appealing aroma） and saoya （elegant and graceful）.However, when it came to make some comments on Liu Yong, who is often considered as a representative composer of vulgarci, the views of the above- mentioned school were changed during its early, middle and late periods of time. In the early period of the school, the representative figures of the school could still appreciate the beauty of Liu’s style in part of hisworks. In the middle period, the representative figures mainly criticized the vulgarness of Liu’s works. In the middle period, the representative figures tended to judge Liu’s works from the perspective of the graceful and restrained poetic genre, the wanyue genre.These changes in view reflect not only the acceptance of Liu’s works in the Qing Dynasty, but also the variation tendency of the ci study thoughts of the West Zhejiang School.