摘要
目的:研究2种生化分析仪在血站全血采集中应用之异同及优劣。方法:通过应用锐尔达半自动生化分析仪Photometer 4040和罗氏干式生化分析仪Reflotron Plus对献血者的采前生化指标检测,2组献血者采前、采后的关键指标及报废率,并比较二者之间的差异。结果:罗氏干式生化分析仪Reflotron Plus在采前只能检测ALT,检测报废率为2.06%;锐尔达半自动生化分析仪Photometer 4040检测ALT报废率0.52%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);Photometer 4040测定乳糜血指数(CB)导致脂肪血报废率0.61%,Reflotron Plus不能检测乳糜指数只能靠采前咨询判断,导致脂肪血报废率3.36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:在全血采集预防ALT、脂肪血导致报废率方面,Photometer 4040优于Reflotron Plus。
Objective:To study the differences of Photometer 4040 and Reflotron Plus on whole blood donation of biochemical levels such as ALT and CB.Method:We analyzed the key characteristics of the two groups of biochemical levels which use two types of biochemical analyzers.Result:There are differences between the two groups in the key characteristics and clinical applications(P〈0.01),and the Photometer 4040 group is less than the Reflotron Plus group in Scrap rate on ALT and CB of whole blood.Conclusion:The Photometer 4040 is superior to the Reflotron Plus on the whole blood donation.
作者
明文娟
赵林园
李翠红
MING Wenjuan;ZHAO Linyuan;LI Cuihong(Dongying Center Blood Station,Dongying,257091,China)
出处
《临床血液学杂志(输血与检验)》
CAS
2018年第5期791-793,共3页
Journal of Clinical Hematology(Blood Transfusion & Laboratory Medicine)