期刊文献+

股票市场涨跌停影响因素及定价效应 被引量:6

The Influencing Factors of the Limit-hit Frequency on Pricing Effects in China Stock Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于涨跌停频率信息和Fama-MacBeth回归方法,使用1998年1月—2017年6月沪深所有A股月度收益率数据,就涨跌停板制度对中国股市定价效应的影响问题进行考察。研究结果表明,动量因子在我国股票市场具有显著的定价效应,涨跌停板制度通过涨跌停频率与动量因子的交积效应影响股票定价,有限套利理论和有限关注行为能对其进行很好的解释。个股涨跌停频率不仅与系统性风险和非系统性风险紧密相关,还受公司规模、账面市值比和公司年龄等因素影响。对维护市场稳定和防范系统性风险而言,应理清交易制度作用于市场定价的具体机制,重视涨跌停频率的驱动成因及其蕴含的系统性风险信息。 Based on the information of limit-hit frequency and Fama-MacBeth cross-sectional regressions method, this paper analyzes the influence of price limits on the pricing effects of China stock market by using the data of monthly returns of A-shares of Shanghai and Shenzhen from January 1998 to June 2017. Results show that the momentum factor has a significant pricing effect in China A-share market. The limit-hit system influences market pricing by the interaction between momentum factor and limit-hit frequency, which can be explained by the limits-to-arbitrage and the limited-attention behavior. The limit-hit frequency of a stock is not only related with its systematic risk and non-systemic risk, but also influenced by the company size, book-to-market ratio, and the company age. As far as market stabilization and the safeguard of systemic risk is concerned, we should pay more attention to the detail mechanism oftradhag system on market pricing and emphasize the driving factors and systemic information of the limit-hit frequency.
作者 黄苑 谢权斌 胡新 Huang Yuan1;Xie Quanbin2;Hu Xin3
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第10期24-35,共12页 Finance & Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于经济金融关联网络的系统性风险动态监管机制研究”(71673225)
关键词 涨跌停板制度 定价效应 涨跌停频率 Fama-MacBeth回归 Limit-hit System Pricing Effect Limit-hit Frequency Fama-MacBeth Regressions
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献64

  • 1徐龙炳,吴林祥.股价涨跌停与市场过度反应:实证分析[J].中国会计评论,2003,1(0):179-190. 被引量:6
  • 2威廉H.格林 王明舰(译).经济计量学[M].中国社会科学出版社,1998..
  • 3赵振全 吕继宏.《涨跌停板对市场有效性的影响》[A]..《21世纪数量经济学》[C].中国统计出版社,2001..
  • 4Cuthbertson, K. , and D. Nitzsche.《数量金融经济学》[M],朱波译,西南财经大学出版社,2008.
  • 5Annaert, J. , J. Van De Broeck, and R. Vennet, Determinants of Mutual Fund Underperformance : A Bayesian Stochastic Frontier Approach [J], European Journal of Operational Research 2003, 151 : 617-632.
  • 6Basso, A. , and Funari, S. , A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to Measure the Mutual Fund Performance [J], European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 3. 477-492.
  • 7Battese, G. E. , and T. J. Coelli, Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data : With Application to Paddy Farmers in India [J], Journal of Productivity Analysis 1992, 3: 153- 169.
  • 8Brown, S.J. , Goetzmann, W. N. , Ibbotson, R. and Ross, S. A. , Survivorshi Pbias in performance studies [J], Review of Financial Studies 1992, 5: 553-580.
  • 9Brown,S.J., and Goetzmann, W.N., Performance Persistence [J], Journal of Finance 1995, 50: 679-698.
  • 10Carhart, M. , On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance [J], Journal of Finance 1997, 52: 57-82.

共引文献117

同被引文献75

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部