期刊文献+

新型16SrRNA基因芯片在新生儿败血症病原检测中的价值研究 被引量:6

The value of new 16S rRNA gene chip in pathogen detection of neonatal sepsis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨新型16S rRNA基因芯片在新生儿败血症病原检测中的价值。方法选择2015年1月至2017年12月北京大学深圳医院新生儿科收治的疑似败血症新生儿为研究对象,对所有新生儿抽取静脉血分别用血培养和基因芯片法进行病原检测,比较两种方法检测的阳性率、检测所需时间和检测所需血量。结果共纳入306例疑似败血症新生儿,其中血培养阳性34例(11.1%),基因芯片法阳性54例(17.6%);98例诊断为新生儿败血症,其中血培养阳性34例(34.7%),基因芯片法阳性52例(53.1%),基因芯片法阳性率均高于血培养(P〈0.05);基因芯片法对新生儿败血症5种常见病原的检出率高于血培养。血培养报阳时间为(14.6±5.5)h,鉴定病原时间为(72.9±19.0) h,基因芯片法报阳时间和鉴定病原时间均为3 h,基因芯片法检测病原所需时间明显短于血培养(P〈0.001)。血培养耗血量1~2 ml,基因芯片法耗血量0.5 ml,基因芯片法耗血量少于血培养。结论与传统血培养相比,基因芯片法能快速检测血中病原菌,有较高的阳性率,并可减少采血量,通过不断改进与完善,在新生儿败血症诊断中有较大的应用价值。 ObjectiveTo study the value of new 16S rRNA gene chip in pathogen detection of neonatal sepsis.MethodNewborns with suspected sepsis hospitalized in Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 were chosen as the subjects. Blood culture and gene chip were both used to detect the pathogens of these infants. The positive rate, the detection time, and the blood volume needed for detection were compared between the two methods.ResultA total of 306 cases of suspected neonatal sepsis were included in the study. Among them, 34 (11.1%) were positive for blood culture and 54 (17.6%) were positive for gene chip. 98 cases were diagnosed as neonatal sepsis, 34 (34.7%) were positive for blood culture, and 52 (53.1%) were positive for gene chip. The positive rate of gene chip was higher than that of blood culture (P〈0.05). For the 5 common pathogens of neonatal sepsis, the positive rate of gene chip was higher than that of blood culture. Time to positivity (TTP) and pathogen identification time of blood culture were (14.6±5.5) h and (72.9±19.0) h, respectively. TTP and pathogen identification time of gene chip were both 3 h. The detection time of gene chip was significantly less than that of blood culture (P〈0.001). The blood volume needed for detection of blood culture and gene chip was 1~2 ml and 0.5 ml. Gene chip needs less blood volume than blood culture.ConclusionCompared with the traditional blood culture, gene chip can quickly detect the pathogens in the blood with higher positive rate and less blood volume. Gene chip is of great value in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.
作者 胡晓艳 徐颂周 吴宇亮 李科铮 王存艳 周于新 Hu Xiaoyan;Xu Songzhou;Wu Yuliang;Li Kezheng;Wang Cunyan;Zhou Yuxin(Department of Neonatology,Peking University Shenzhen Hospital,Shenzhen 518036,China)
出处 《中华新生儿科杂志(中英文)》 CAS 2018年第5期325-328,共4页 Chinese Journal of Neonatology
基金 深圳市科技创新委员会基础研究项目(JcYJ20140415162542983、JCYJ20170307112202156)
关键词 RNA 核糖体 16S 病原 基因芯片 败血症 婴儿 新生 RNA ribosomal 16S Noxae Gene chip Septicemia Infant newborn
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献52

  • 1童美琴,尚世强,吴亦栋,赵正言.16SrRNA基因PCR加基因芯片杂交快速诊断新生儿败血症[J].中华儿科杂志,2004,42(9):663-667. 被引量:26
  • 2麦奇,陈才进,林湛.新生儿败血症主要病原菌及其耐药分析[J].实用医学杂志,2005,21(11):1177-1178. 被引量:2
  • 3郑季彦,尚世强,吴亦栋,徐亚萍,杜立中.16S rRNA基因芯片诊断新生儿败血症[J].中华传染病杂志,2005,23(3):187-190. 被引量:10
  • 4尚世强,洪文澜,石一复,余钟声,顾佩宝,潘存梅.孕妇巨细胞病毒、弓形虫感染及其可能导致宫内的传播[J].中华传染病杂志,1996,14(3):152-155. 被引量:6
  • 5Teng LJ, Hsueh PR, Huang YH, et al. Identification of bacteroides thetaiotaomicron on the basis of an unexpected specific amplicon of universal 16S ribosomal DNA PCR [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2004, 42(4): 1727-1730.
  • 6Shang S, Chen Z, Yu X. Detection of bacterial DNA by PCR and reverse hybridization in the 16S rRNA gene with particular reference to neonatal septicemia [J]. Acta Paediatr, 2001,90 (2) : 179-183.
  • 7Shang S, Chen G, Wu Y, et al. Rapid diagnosis of bacterial sepsis with PCR amplification and microarray hybridization in 16S rRNA gene[J]. Pediatr Res, 2005,58( 1 ) : 143-148.
  • 8Lieu TA, Schwartz JS, Jaffe DM, et al. Strategies for diagnosis and treatment of children at risk for occult bacteremia: clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness. J Pediatr,1991,118:21-29.
  • 9Downs SM, McNutt RA, Margolis PA. Management of infants at risk for occult bacteremia: a decision analysis. J Pediatr,1991,118:11-20.
  • 10Kricka L J. Microchips, microarrays, biochips and nanochips: personal laboratories for the 21st century. J Clin Clim Acta,2001,307:219-223.

共引文献140

同被引文献89

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部