期刊文献+

以“科学和工程实践”视角分析高中化学教科书

Analysis of Senior High School Chemistry Textbooks from the Perspective of Science and Engineering Practice
原文传递
导出
摘要 以"科学和工程实践"的8大环节和学习者主体性2个维度建立模型,分析上海科学技术出版社出版的高中化学教科书中的实践活动。发现此教科书中的实践十分注重分析环节,能较好发挥学生主体性的环节有:科学实践中的分析解释数据环节;工程实践中的建模、计划、实施调查等环节。但总体上工程实践不足,无论科学实践还是工程实践,在提出问题、设计步骤这2个环节上学生过于被动。据此认为,在化学教科书实践活动的修改或教学优化上,应增强学生的主动性,除了要开展科学探究活动,也要适当增加工程设计等活动。 This paper established the model with 2 dimensions of the 8 aspects of"science and engineering practice"and learner's subjectivity,analyzed the practical activities in high school chemistry textbooks published by Shanghai Science and Technology Press,and found that this textbooks paid great attention to the practice of analysis,gave full play to students' subjectivity to analyze and interpret data better and scientifically,and to model,plan and implement investigations in engineering practice.But on the whole,the engineering practice was seriously insufficient.No matter the scientific practice or the engineering practice,the students were too passive in asking questions and designing steps.Therefore,we should strengthen the initiative of students in the revision or teaching optimization of chemistry textbooks,in addition to carrying out scientific research activities,we should also appropriately increase the activities of engineering design.
作者 赵小昕 秦浩正 ZHAO Xiao-Xin;QIN Hao-Zheng(College of Life and Environmental Sciences,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200233,China)
出处 《化学教育(中英文)》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第21期11-17,共7页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
关键词 科学实践 工程实践 学生主体性 高中化学 science practice engineering practice student subjectivity senior high schoolchemistry
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献43

  • 1National Research Council. A Framework for K - 12 Science Education :Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas [ M ]. Washington, D. C. : THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS, 2011.
  • 2Achieve, Inc. [ EB/0L ] http ://www. nextgenscience, org/international - benchmarking/2011 - 10 - 15.
  • 3National Research Council.A Framework for K-12 Seience Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas [M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2012.30,42-44 ,44,45.
  • 4National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[S].Washington,D.C.:The National Academies Press,1996. 23,105.
  • 5C.R.Mann.The Interpretation of the College Entrance Examination Board's New Definition of the Requirement in Physies [J].Educational Review,1909(7).
  • 6John Dewey,Science as Subject-Matter and as Method[J].Science,1910, (1).
  • 7John Dewey.How We Think[M].Lexington,MA:Heath,1910.72.
  • 8Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society .General Education in a Free Society:Report of the Harvard Committee[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1945.158.
  • 9John Dewey. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process[M].Boston,MA:D.C.Heath and Company,1933.115-116.
  • 10Jerome Bruner.Process of Education[M].Boston,MA:Harbard University Press,1961.14.

共引文献540

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部