摘要
医疗服务人的说明义务性质并非单一,不同说明义务对应的患者法益各异,知情同意权范畴必将混淆不同的法律关系。在说明过失案型,保护的法益系身体权,知情同意当定位为抗辩机制(违法阻却事由)。意志自主当以类型化方式保护,不能将诸如"自我决定权"这样以纯粹意志自主为内容的权利阑入权利体系。"侵害患者知情同意权责任纠纷"案由应修正为"患者知情同意纠纷"。
Rather than serving as the content of a special personality right (besonderes Pers nlichkeitsrecht), patient's informed consent should be classified as a defense mechanism which be used to preclude the illegality of intentional touching of other person's body. As to the protection of autonomy, a teleological reduction method should be adopted by classifying autonomy under different types of legal interests. The cause of action of "Dispute over infringing patients" right to informed consent^should be modified as "Dispute over patients^informed consent".
作者
唐超
TANG Chao(Law School,Shantou University,Shantou 515063 China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第11期87-97,共11页
Hebei Law Science
基金
北京市教育委员会人文社会科学研究计划一般项目<中国医患关系法的困境与出路>(SM201610025003)
汕头大学科研启动基金资助项目
关键词
说明义务
知情同意
身体完整性
意志自主
类型化
duty to inform
informed consent
bodily integrity
autonomy
classification