期刊文献+

基于国际竞争力指数的“一带一路”沿线国家分类及合作共建原则 被引量:3

The Classification and Co-construction Principles of Countries Participating in the Belt and Road Initiative Based on the Global Competitiveness Index
原文传递
导出
摘要 由于不同国家的合作机会和风险千差万别,要实现中国与"一带一路"沿线国家的合作共建,不能搞"一个方案""一刀切"。中国"走出去"的要素、能力应与沿线各国现实需求相适应,围绕各个国家复杂多样的竞争态势和发展模式,从国情出发进行分类研究。在对比简单分类基础上,依据国际竞争力指数将"一带一路"沿线国家划分为整体协同、趋向协同、趋向优势、寻求优势四类。中国与"一带一路"沿线国家进行合作共建,知己知彼是前提,既要系统研究沿线国家的战略状态、内在结构和优劣势还要从本国的发展阶段、发展目标和客观条件出发,寻求共赢的合作契机。 Due to the diversity of cooperation opportunities and risks between different countries,to realize the cooperation and co-construction between China and countries participating in the "Belt and Road"initiative,we cannot just engage in "one plan"and "one size fits all". The elements and capabilities of China's"going out"should be adapted to the actual needs of participating countries. A classified study should be conducted based on the complex and diverse competitive situations and positions of each country. On the basis of comparison and simple classification,according to the Global Competitiveness Index,participating countries can be divided into four categories,namely,overall synergy,trending synergy,trending advantage and seeking advantage. It's a premise for us to know ourselves and know each other on the co-construction between China and the participating countries. We should systematically study the strategic status,internal structure,advantages and disadvantages of the participating countries,and seek win-win opportunities for cooperation based on the development stage,development goals and objective conditions of our own countries.
作者 彭丽红 Peng Li-hong(School of Economics,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)
出处 《经济纵横》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第10期88-97,共10页 Economic Review Journal
关键词 一带一路 整体协同 趋向协同 趋向优势 寻求优势 合作共建 The Belt and Road Initiatives Overall Synergy Trend Synergy Trending Advantage Seeking Advantage Cooperation and Co - construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1Economic Strategies Committee. High - Skilled People, Innovative Economy, Distinctive Global City [ EB/OL]. 2010. http://www, esc. gov. sg/attactments/ESC% 20Report. pdf.
  • 2Phang, et al. From efficiency -driven to innovation - driven economic growth: perspectives from Singapore [ R]. World Bank Working Paper, 2005.
  • 3Economic Review Committee (ERC). Report of the E- conomic Review Committee: New Challenges, Fresh Goals - Towards a Dynamic Global City [ EB/OL].Singapore: Ministry of Trade and Industry. 2003. ht- tp ://www. mti. gov. sg/publie/ERC/frm_ERC_Defauh. asp.9 sid = 150.
  • 4KPMG. Competitive Alternatives: KPMG's guide to comparing business locations [ R]. 2006.
  • 5Parayil G. From "silicon island" to "biopolis of Asia" : innovation policy and shifting competitive strategy in Sin- gapore [ J]. California Management Review, 2005, 47 (2): 50 -73.
  • 6Yusuf S, Nabeshima K. Post industrial East Asian Cit- ies: Innovation for Growth [ M ]. The World Bank Press, 2006. 101 - 120.
  • 7Yusuf S,Nabeshima K. Creative industries in East Asia [J]. Cities, 2005, 22(2): 109-122.
  • 8Economic Review Committee. Service Industries Sub- committee Workgroup on Creative Industries. Creative Industries Development Strategy [ R]. Singapore : ERC. 2002.
  • 9Economic Review Committee. Sub -committee on En- trepreneurship and Internationalisation [ R]. Singapore : ERC. 2002.
  • 10Wong, et al. Singapore as an innovative city in East A- sia: An Explorative Study of the Perspectives of Innova- tive Industries[ R]. World Bank Policy Research Work- ing Paper 3568. 2005.

共引文献80

同被引文献73

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部