摘要
目的对分娩全程护理模式在产科护理中所产生的临床应用效果进行深入探讨分析。方法选取我院产科自2017年1月至2017年12月接诊分娩的共计100例产妇作为本次研究对象,对其应用抽签的方式随机分为基础护理组与特别护理组,每组有50例产妇组成。基础护理组所有产妇接受常规护理模式,而对特别护理组产妇实施分娩全程护理模式。对两组产妇生产时间以及产后出血率进行分析对比。结果特别护理组产妇生产时间为(486.32±121.16)分,基础护理组产妇生产时间为(749.38±134.69)分,两组产妇生产时间对比特别护理组有明显优势;基础护理组共有7例产妇有产后出血现象,14%为其出血率,特别护理组产妇仅有2例产妇有出血现象,其产后出血率为4.0%,两组数据对比特别护理组产妇出血率明显低于基础护理组产妇。P<0.05以上数据均具有统计学意义。结论采用分娩全程护理模式对分娩产妇进行护理不仅可对其生产时间明显缩短,对于产后出血率也可明显减低,对产妇分娩恢复有积极意义。
Objective to explore and analyze clinical application effect of delivery whole course nursing mode in obstetric nursing deeply. Methods choose 100 cases parturients from January 2017 to December 2017 in obstetrics and gynecology department of our hospital as study objects. With drawing lots method divide them into basic nursing group and special nursing group randomly, 50 cases in each. Basic nursing group was treated with routine nursing mode, and whole nursing mode with special nursing group. Analyze and compare maternal production time and postpartum hemorrhage rate of two groups. Resultspuerpera delivery time of special nursing group was(486.32±121.16)min, that of basic nursing group was(749.38±134.69) min. Special nursing group had obvious advantages compared with basic nursing group: 7 cases in basic nursing group had postpartum hemorrhage, with hemorrhage rate of 14%, and 2 cases had postpartum hemorrhage in special nursing group, with hemorrhage rage of 4.0%, that of special nursing group was significantly lower than basic nursing group. Data above showed statistical significance, P〈0.05. Conclusion delivery whole course nursing mode can shorten delivery time obviously, reduce postpartum hemorrhage rate, which is of positive significance to recovery of parturient.
作者
蒋军凤
JIANG Jun-feng(Quanzhou County Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital,Guilin,Guangxi,541500)
出处
《智慧健康》
2018年第18期51-52,共2页
Smart Healthcare
关键词
分娩全程护理模式
产科护理
临床应用效果
Delivery whole course nursing mode
Obstetric nursing
Clinical application effect