期刊文献+

经皮椎体后凸成形术和椎弓根钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折近期效果比较 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较经皮椎体后凸成形术和椎弓根钉内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的近期疗效。方法:胸腰椎骨折患者40例,其中采用经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP组)19例,采用椎弓根钉内固定术(椎弓根钉组)21例。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、下地活动时间;术后3天、1个月、3个月、12个月疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS);术后3天、6个月、12个月椎体前缘高度;术前、术后3天、术后12个月时Cobb角以及并发症。结果:PKP组手术时间42.67±6.32 min,术中出血量21.56±6.26 mL,下地活动时间1.57±0.43 d,分别少于椎弓根钉组的105.35±11.53 min,81.79±26.51 mL,15.41±1.21 d,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PKP组术后3天、1个月、3个月VAS疼痛评分分别为3.4±0.8分,1.9±0.7分,1.8±0.6分,低于椎弓根钉组的4.2±0.6分,2.6±0.6分,2.3±0.5分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者在术后3天、6个月、12个月椎体前缘高度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。椎弓根钉组Cobb角术后3天为5.2°±0.8°,术后12个月为7.8°±1.7°,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),PKP组Cobb角术后3天为4.8°±1.2°,术后12月时为5.3°±1.3°,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组间Cobb角矫正度、丢失度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:经皮椎体后凸成形术具有微创、快速缓解早期疼痛、术后恢复快、更好维持近期脊柱矫正度的优点,值得推广运用。
出处 《交通医学》 2018年第5期435-436,439,共3页 Medical Journal of Communications
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1Gu Y,Zhang F,Jiang X,et al. Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty in the sur- gical treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporo- sis fracture [J]. J Neurosurg Spine,2013,18 (6) : 634-640.
  • 2Wood KB,Buttermann GR,Phukan R,et al.Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit:a prospective randomized study with follow-up at sixteen to twenty-two years[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2015,97(1):3-9.
  • 3Fang LM,Zhang YJ,Zhang J,et al.Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures and posterior ligamentous complex injuries[J].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao,2012,44(6):851-854.
  • 4Tan BB,Chan CY,Saw LB,et al.Percutaneous pedicle screw for unstable spine fractures in polytraumatized patients:a report of two cases[J].Indian J Orthop,2012,46(6):710-713.
  • 5Vaccaro AR,Oner C,Kepler CK,et al.AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system:fracture description,neurological status,and key modifiers[J].Spine,2013,38(23):2028-2037.
  • 6Roy-Camille R,Roy-Camille M,Demeulenaere C.Plate fixation of dorsolumbar vertebral metastases[J].Nouv Presse Med,1972,1(37):2463-2466.
  • 7Gnanenthiran SR,Adie S,Harris IA.Nonoperative versus operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2012,470(2):567-577.
  • 8Reinhold M,Knop C,Beisse R,et al.Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries:comprehensive results from the second,prospective,internet-based multicenter study of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery[J].Eur Spine J,2010,19(10):1657-1676.
  • 9Singh R,Rohilla RK,Kamboj K,et al.Outcome of pedicle screw fixation and monosegmental fusion in patients with fresh thoracolumbar fractures[J].Asian Spine J,2014,8(3):298-308.
  • 10Bolesta MJ,Caron T,Chinthakunta SR,et al.Pedicle screw instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures:Biomechanical evaluation of screw configuration with pedicle screws at the level of the fracture[J].Int J Spine Surgery,2012,6:200-205.

共引文献78

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部