期刊文献+

论紧急权力的合宪性控制

Constitutional Control on the Emergency Power
下载PDF
导出
摘要 紧急权力的行使须接受合宪性审查,但却受到一定的限制:有些国家的违宪审查机构对紧急状态决定、法令及紧急处置措施不能进行合宪性审查,而在可进行合宪性审查的国家,违宪审查机构亦采取了合宪性推定、合宪性解释等技术或方法。紧急状态下不仅公民基本权利会受到较平时更为严厉的限制,且紧急行政权的行使亦无需遵守严格的法律保留原则。 Constitutional review power is limited in the state of emergency,constitutional review institution in some countries can 't review the constitutionality of emergent decision,emergent law,etc. And in other countries constitutional review institution would take the technique and method such as presumption of constitutionality and constitutional interpretation when reviewing the constitutionality of emergent laws and decisions. Human rights will be more strictly limited in the state of emergency than in the normal time. Implementation of emergent administrative power may not obey the principle of law reservation in the strict meaning.
作者 饶龙飞 RAO Long-fei(School of Political Science and Law,Jinggangshan University,Ji'an 343009,China)
出处 《太原师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第4期76-81,共6页 Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家社科基金西部项目"历史 逻辑与价值视域下的违宪概念研究"(17XFX001) 井冈山大学博士科研启动项目(JRB1704)
关键词 紧急状态 合宪性审查 人权克减 法律保留原则 state of emergency constitutional review human rights derogation the principle of law reservation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献160

共引文献302

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部