期刊文献+

基于失效模式和效应分析的静脉用茶碱类药物管理策略研究 被引量:6

Study on management strategy of intravenous theophyllines based on failure mode and effect analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的用失效模式和效应分析(FMEA)法探讨静脉用茶碱类药物管理过程发生用药错误的风险点,改进管理措施,提高用药安全性。方法应用FMEA法对解放军总医院第一附属医院和哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院静脉用茶碱类药品流通全环节可能存在的安全隐患进行分析,计算风险优先级数(RPN),以RPN〉216分的风险点为静脉用茶碱类药物管理过程中的关键风险点,针对这些风险点制定管理和技术策略,比较管理措施改进前后的防范效果。结果经综合评价,梳理出药品说明书信息缺失、给药剂量错误、患者评估失当、医嘱审核未有效拦截、血药浓度监测缺失、用药交代不完善等关键风险点,并针对这些风险点制定了管理及技术策略。实施管理策略及技术策略后,上述风险点的RPN评分从(269±41)分下降至(53±27)分,实施前后比较差异有统计学意义(t=9.454, P〈0.001)。结论利用FMEA法可将药物安全管理过程中失效模式的重要程度加以量化,明确高警示药品管理改善的优先顺序,可有效规避用药风险,提高用药安全性。 ObjectiveTo explore the risk points of medication errors in the management process of intravenous theophyllines by failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and improve the management measures to enhance the medication safety. MethodsThe potential safety risks in each link during intravenous theophyllines circulation in First Affiliated Hospital of PLA General Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were analyzed using FMEA method and the risk priority number (RPN) was calculated. The risk points, whose RPN scores were 〉216, were taken as the key ones during the management of intravenous theophyllines. Management and technical strategies were drawn up for the key risk points and preventive effects before and after the improvement measures were compared.ResultsAfter comprehensive evaluation, the key risk points such as missing information of drug instructions, wrong dosage, inappropriate assessment for patients, omission of prescription checking, absence of blood concentration monitoring, and imperfection of doctor′s advice to patient and etc. were sorted out, and management and technical strategies were drawn up. The RPN scores of above risk points decreased from (269±41) to (53±27) before and after the implementation of preventive strategies and the difference was statistically significant (t=9.454, P〈0.001).ConclusionThe importance of failure modes in safety management of drugs is quantified by FMEA method, priority sequence of improvement for high-alert medication management is pointed out, and medication safety is improved.
作者 李莎 李宁 杨丽杰 马兰 刘芳 王芳 Li Sha;Li Ning;Yang Lijie;Ma Lan;Liu Fang;Wang Fang(Department of Pharmacology,First Affiliated Hospital of PIA General Hospital,Beifing 100048,China(Li S,Ma L,Wang F;Department of Pharmacy,the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150001,China(Li N,Yang LJ;Department of Pharmacy,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China(Liu F)
出处 《药物不良反应杂志》 CSCD 2018年第5期334-339,共6页 Adverse Drug Reactions Journal
基金 中国药学会医院药学专业委员会高警示药品管理系列项目 北京大学第三医院回国人员启动基金(Y73517-01)
关键词 医疗保健失效模式和效应分析 茶碱 风险管理 Failure mode and effect analysis Theophylline Risk management
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献26

  • 1王大猷.药物治疗错误与医务人员的对策[J].中国药物应用与监测,2004,1(2):1-4. 被引量:9
  • 2Tilyard M, Dovey S, Hall K. Avoiding and fixing medical errors in general practice:prevention strategies reported in the Linnaeus Co- llaboration's Primary Care International Study of Medical Errors [J].NZMedJ, 2005, 118(1208): U1264.
  • 3Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human:building a safer health system [ M ]. Washington, D. C. : National Academy Press, 2000:2.
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部.医疗机构药事管理规定[EB/OL].(2011-03-30)[2013-04-14].http://www.moh.gov.en/mohyzs/s3585/201103/51113.shtml.
  • 5National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. About Medication Errors E EB/OL ]. ( 2001-02-20 ) [ 2013-11-28 ]. http ://www. nccmerp, org/aboutMedErrors, html.
  • 6Institute for safe medication practices. Frequently asked questions (FAQ) [EB/OL]. [2013-11-28] https://www, ismp. org/faq. asp#Question_2.
  • 7European Medicines Agency. Medication errors[ EB/OL]. [2013- 11-28 ] http://www, ema. europa, eu/ema/index, jsp? curl = pa- ges/special_topics/general/general_content_000570, jsp.
  • 8张晓乐.用药错误:概念、分类和报告现状[N].中国医学论坛报,2011-10-26(A6).
  • 9Ferner RE, Aronson JK. Clarification of terminology in medication errors[ J]. Drug safety, 2006, 29 ( 11 ) : 1011-1022.
  • 10Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug e- vents and potential adverse drug events. Implications for preven- tion. ADE Prevention Study Group [ J ]. JAMA, 1995, 274 ( 1 ) : 29-34.

共引文献192

同被引文献58

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部