期刊文献+

对不同超声血流信号的子宫瘢痕妊娠患者进行子宫动脉栓塞术联合清宫术的效果对比 被引量:1

To compare the effects of uterine arterial embolization and hysterectomy in pregnancy with different ultrasound blood flow signals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :对比对不同超声血流信号的子宫瘢痕妊娠患者进行子宫动脉栓塞术联合清宫术的临床效果。方法 :将2012年7月至2018年2月期间在昆山市第一人民医院和启东市人民医院进行子宫动脉栓塞术联合清宫术的120例子宫瘢痕妊娠患者作为研究对象。将这120例患者分为少量血流组(n=51)和血流丰富组(n=69)。对两组患者均进行子宫动脉栓塞术联合清宫术。然后,比较两组患者治疗的成功率、各项临床指标及其术中与术后相关并发症的发生率。结果 :两组患者治疗的成功率均为100%。与血流丰富组患者相比,少量血流组患者术中的出血量更少,其住院的时间、术后β-HCG(β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素)水平恢复正常的时间和术后阴道流血的时长均更短,P <0.05。两组患者术中与术后相关并发症的发生率相比,P>0.05。结论 :与超声血流信号较少的子宫瘢痕妊娠患者相比,超声血流信号丰富的子宫瘢痕妊娠患者在进行子宫动脉栓塞术联合清宫术时出血量更大,其术后恢复的速度更慢。因此,在对宫瘢痕妊娠患者进行子宫动脉栓塞术联合清宫术时,可将超声血流信号作为其手术风险和疗效的评价指标。 objective: to compare the clinical effects of uterine arterial embolization combined with hysterectomy in patients with uterine scar pregnancy with different ultrasound blood flow signals. Methods: 120 cases of pregnant women with uterine scar who underwent uterine arterial embolization combined with hysterectomy in kunshan first people's hospital and qidong people's hospital from July 2012 to February 2018 were studied. The 120 patients were divided into small blood flow groups(n=51) and rich blood flow groups(n=69). Both groups were treated with uterine arterial embolization combined with hysterectomy. Then, the success rate, clinical indicators and the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. Results: the success rate of the two groups was 100%. Compared with patients in the blood flow rich group, patients in the small blood flow group had less blood loss during the operation, and their hospitalization time, postoperative HCG(human chorionic gonadotropin) level returned to normal and postoperative vaginal bleeding time were shorter, P〈0.05. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications in the two groups was compared, P〉0.05. Conclusion: compared with patients with uterine scar pregnancy who have less ultrasound blood flow signal, patients with uterine scar pregnancy who have abundant ultrasound blood flow signal have more blood loss and slower postoperative recovery rate when undergoing uterine artery embolization combined with hysterectomy. Therefore, the ultrasound blood flow signal can be used as the evaluation index of the surgical risk and curative effect of uterine arterial embolization combined with hysterectomy in patients with uterine scar pregnancy.
作者 张雪刚 顾星 黄华平 梁向华 Zhang xuegang;Gu xing;Huang huaping;Liang xianghua(The gynecology department of kunshan first people's hospital,jiangsu kunshan 215300;Department of obstetrics and gynecology,qidong people's hospital,qidong,jiangsu 226200)
出处 《当代医药论丛》 2018年第19期24-26,共3页
关键词 超声检查 超声血流信号 子宫瘢痕妊娠 子宫动脉栓塞术 清宫术 ultrasonic inspection Uhrasonic blood flow signal Uterine scar pregnancy Uterine arterial embolization Qing dynasty palace art
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献154

  • 1刘晞,刘芳荪,刘东.腔内彩色多普勒超声在剖宫产术后子宫下段切口妊娠诊断中的应用[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(8):1208-1211. 被引量:26
  • 2金力,范光升,郎景和.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的早期诊断与治疗[J].生殖与避孕,2005,25(10):630-634. 被引量:243
  • 3韦浪花,庄亚玲,黄丽丽.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕处早期妊娠70例临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(7):487-488. 被引量:84
  • 4Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management[ J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23 : 247-253.
  • 5Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar [ J 1. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneeol, 2003,21:220-227.
  • 6Sinha P, Mishra M. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a precursor of placenta percreta/accreta[ J~. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2012,32:621- 623.
  • 7Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options [ J ]. Curt Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2011,23 :415-421.
  • 8Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, et al. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect [ J ]. Am J Perinatol, 2012,29 : 465 471.
  • 9Yazicioglu HF, Sevket O, Ekin M, et al. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section: is it preventable by intraoperative digital dilatation of the internal cervical ostium? [ J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2012,74 : 131-135.
  • 10Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009,34:90-97.

共引文献1143

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部