摘要
共享经济能增加就业机会,提高闲置资产利用率,也会对传统企业造成冲击。政府如何应对共享经济,是一个有待研究的问题。在分析"滴滴出行"案例的基础上,发现了政府规制对供给意愿的影响。通过模拟共享出行实验发现,无政府规制、事前规制、事后规制对供给意愿的影响存在显著差异,无政府规制供给意愿最高,事前规制供给意愿最低,造成这种差异的原因在于规制导致的供给者剩余不同。进一步研究发现,"监管俘获"是政府规制的重要动因之一,研究发现对于政府如何应对共享经济提供了有益的启示。
Sharing economy can increase the employment opportunities and the utilization of idle assets, and also can attack traditional businesses. How the government deals with the sharing economy is a subject to be studied. Based on the analysis of the case of " DiDi" , we find out the influence of government regulation on supply intention. Through simulating sharing travel experiments, it is found that no government regulation, ex-regulation and post-regulation impose significant diversified influence on supply intention, with no government regulation having the highest supply intention and pre-regulation having the minimum one. The reason for this discrepancy arises from the ditterent supplier surplus caused by regulations. Further literature research finds that " regulatory capture" is one of the important motives for government regulation. The discovery of this article provides useful enlightenment to the government on how to deal with the sharing economy.
作者
沈超红
胡安
SHEN Chaohong;HU An(School of Business,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)
出处
《经济与管理评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期47-59,共13页
Review of Economy and Management
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目"共享经济现象的CHS理论建构与实证研究"(17AGL003)
关键词
政府规制
供给意愿
事前规制
事后规制
供给者剩余
监管俘获
Government regulation
Supply intention
Ex-regulation
Post-regulation
Supplier surplus
Regulatory capture