期刊文献+

医学院校大学生思维风格的差异性研究:以北京中医药大学为例

Differences in thinking styles among medical students: A case study of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的以北京中医药大学为例研究医学院校大学生思维风格特点及差异性。方法运用斯滕伯格思维风格量表(中文版),采用随机整群抽样的方式对120名在校三年级和四年级学生进行调研,运用SPSS20.0软件对数据进行t检验、方差分析和等级资料秩和检验。结果医学院校中医、中药、管理专业平等竞争型思维风格得分分别为(4.09±0.67)(3.64±0.50)(3.72±0.56),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);男生、女生立法型思维风格得分分别为(5.14±0.63)(4.90±0.62),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);审判型思维风格得分分别为(4.46±0.56)(4.23±0.62),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);专制型思维风格得分分别为(4.22±0.52)(3.79±0.57),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.001);全局型思维风格得分分别为(4.36±0.48)(4.00±0.63),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);内倾型思维风格得分分别为(4.48±0.74)(4.18±0.76),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);激进型思维风格得分分别为(4.79±0.71)(4.49±0.68),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);有父母卫生背景、无父母卫生背景的大学生审判型思维风格得分分别为(3.97±0.64)(4.35±0.59),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);无政府型思维风格得分分别为(4.39±0.32)(4.06±0.50),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论医学院校大学生在立法型、审判型、专制型、平等竞争型、无政府型、全局型、内倾型和激进型思维风格上有差异,其思维风格与性别、主修专业、父母背景等存在相关性。 Objective To study the differences and the features of thinking styles among undergrad-uates in Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. Methods The thinking styles of a total of 120 under-graduates of grade 3 and 4 were investigated with Sternberg Thinking Style Scale (Chinese version) by ran- dom cluster sampling. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (version 20.0) by means of t-test, analysis of variance and rank sum test. Results The score of oligarchic style in traditional Chinese medicine, traditional Chinese medicine and management students was (4.09 ± 0.67), (3.64 ± 0.50) and (3.72 ± 0.56) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.01). The score of legislative style was ,(5.14 ± 0.63) in boys and (4.90 ± 0.62) in girls, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). The score of judicial style was (4.46 ± 0.56) and (4.23 ± 0.62) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). The score of monarchic style was (4.22 ± 0.52) and (3.79 ± 0.57) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.001). The score of global style was (4.36 ± 0.48) and (4.00 ± 0.63) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.01). The score of internal style was (4.48 ± 0.74) and (4.18 ± 0.76) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). The score of liberal style was (4.79 ± 0.71) and (4.49 ± 0.68) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). The score of judicial style in undergraduates with and without parents engaged in health industry was (3.97 ±0.64) and (4.35 ± 0.59) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈 0.05). The score of anarchic style was (4.39 ± 0.32) and (4.06±0.50) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Correlated with undergraduate majors, gender and parents' background, Medical students differ in .legislative style, judicial style, monarchic style, oligarchic style, anarchic style, global style, internal style and liberal style, which correlates with gender, major and parents' background.
作者 张怡淳子 谭曦 孔军辉 Zhang Yichunzi;Tan Xi;Kong Junhui(College of Management,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China;Graduate School,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China)
出处 《中华医学教育探索杂志》 2018年第10期1022-1028,共7页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81403499)
关键词 思维风格 大学生 医学院校 Thinking style Undergraduates Medical colleges and universities
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献43

  • 1郑磊磊,刘爱伦.思维风格与创造性倾向关系的研究[J].应用心理学,2000,6(2):14-20. 被引量:27
  • 2钱丽菊,孙延强,王凌波,姜乾金.影响大学生考试应对的相关因素[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(2):161-162. 被引量:5
  • 3Steinberg, R J. Thinking Styles. Cambridge University Press,1997:6-26.
  • 4Sternberg, R J. Beyond IQ: A Triaehie Theory of Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, 1985:31-38.
  • 5Sternberg, R J. Successful Intelligence. New York: Plume, 1996:181 - 195.
  • 6Steinberg, R J. A Balance Theory of Wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2 : 347 - 365.
  • 7Sternberg, R J. Allowing for Thinking Styles. Educational Leadership, 1994,52 ( 3 ).
  • 8Sternberg, R J. Mental Self- government: A Theory of Intellectual Styles and Their Development. Human Development, 31 : 197 - 224.
  • 9Steinberg R J. Thinking style. New York: Cambridge University Press , 1997 , 18 - 26.
  • 10Li-Fang Zhang. Do styles of thinking matter among HK secondary school students? Personality and Individual Differences. 2001,31 : 289- 301.

共引文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部