期刊文献+

经济博弈中不同性别儿童的“以貌取人”对决策行为的影响 被引量:2

The Influence of Physical Attractiveness on Economic Decision-making in Children of Different Gender
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以40名8-11岁小学生为被试,采用最后通牒博弈范式,探讨提议者的不同外貌吸引力对不同性别儿童经济决策行为的影响.结果发现:(1)儿童回应者更容易接受外貌高吸引条件下的不公平提议;(2)回应者的外貌对女孩的决策有显著影响.她们更愿意接受高吸引外貌提议者做出的不公平分配;回应者的外貌对男孩的决策不存在显著影响.研究表明儿童在社会互动情境中的经济决策行为存在"以貌取人"的现象,而且女孩更容易受到对方外貌的影响. The study was designed to investigate the effects of the appearance of the proposers on the behavioral responses of respondents in the ultimatum game. Participants were 40 students from 3 and 5 grades. The results showed that: (1)The acceptation rates had significant differences between physical un attractive and attractive proposers. (2)Girls were more influenced by physical attractiveness. They inclined to accept unfair offers by physically attractive proposers. Physical appearance had no significant influences on the acceptance rate of unfair offers made by boys.
作者 王芹 白学军 袁心颖 尹吉端 WANG Qin;BAI Xue jun;YUAN Xing ying;JI Duan(Academy of Psychology and Behavior,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300071,China)
出处 《内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版)》 CAS 2018年第6期522-526,共5页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 天津市哲学社会科学规划(TJJX16-013)项目
关键词 外貌 经济决策 最后通牒博弈 physical attractiveness the ultimatum game decision making
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1潘佳雁.中学生同伴交往接受和拒绝的归因研究[J].心理科学,2002,25(1):64-68. 被引量:28
  • 2Camerer, C. (1997). Progress in behavioral game theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 167- 188.
  • 3Camerer, C. F. ( 2003 ). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • 4Eckel, C. C. , & Grc,ssman, P. J. (2001). Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry, 39, 171 - 188.
  • 5Eckel, C. C. , & Grossman, P. J. (2005). Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In. C. Plott and V. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, New York: North Holland.
  • 6Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367- 388.
  • 7Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowl,s, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E. , Gintis, H. , et al. (2001). In search of homo economics: Experiments in 15 small - scale societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73-79.
  • 8Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286.
  • 9Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 208- 224.
  • 10Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision - making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755- 1758.

共引文献33

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部