期刊文献+

我国献血不良反应监测管理现状 被引量:20

Status Investigation on the current monitoring and management of adverse reactions in blood donation in China Mainland
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解我国献血不良反应(以下简称献血反应)管理现状,推进我国haemovigilance(HV)工作,为解决大陆采供血机构执业比对结果中发现各血站之间献血反应监测数据差别较大的问题提供借鉴经验,开展此调研工作。方法根据调查目的制定调研表,调研表包括8个内容,由我国大陆执业比对工作组秘书处发放至63家成员单位,对反馈信息汇总分析讨论。结果共收到44家血站(含18家血液中心和26家中心血站)的反馈信息。多数采供血机构监测献血反应依据的是内部标准;数据采集方法、记录格式、归档方式等均存在较大差异;尽管多数血站回访发生献血反应的献血者,但回访程序不同;对献血反应数据的分析、利用和改进工作缺乏统一的程序和负责人;各血站配备预防和处置献血反应所使用的急救、采血、体检和改善采血环境的物品差异较大。结论建立我国特色的HV统一规划和管理系统,有助于改善献血反应的管理水平,提高献血服务质量。 Objectives The monitoring data of donor complications among blood stations were quite different. In order to understand the similarities and differences in the collection,collation and analysis of donor complications data of various agencies,we carried out this investigation. Methods A survey consisting of method for monitoring donor complications and stuff/department managing donor complications was developed and distributed to 63 members by Working Group Secretariat of the Comparison of Practice. After completion,the questionnaires will be sent back for summary and analysis. Results We received 44 answered questionnaires,including 18 from provincial blood centers and 26 from municipal blood stations. Most blood stations monitored donor complication based on internal standards. There were large differences in data collection methods,formats,and archiving protocols. There were no uniform procedure and responsible staff for the analysis,utilization and improvement of donor complication data. Conclusion Unified planning and management can help to improve the outcome of donor complication and improve the quality of blood donation services.
作者 高波 周源 李永铭 吴南 庞霄 张旸 马海莉 马伟 黄霞 侯玲 尤榕 田志彬 黄泽 郭成城 邱艳 GAO Bo;ZHOU Yuan;LI Yongming;WU Nang;PANG Xiao;ZHANG Yang;MA Haili;MA Wei;HUANG Xia;HOU Ling;YOU Rong;TIAN Zhibin;HUANG Ze;GUO Chengcheng;QIU Yan(Beijing Red Cross Blood Center,Beijing 10041,China;Taiyuan Red Cross Blood Center;Gansu Red Cross Blood Center;Neimenggu Blood Center;Anhui Blood Center,;Guangzhou Blood Center;Yunnan Kunming Blood Center;Ningxia Blood Center;Chongqing Blood Center;Heilongjiang Blood Center;Jiangxi Blood Center;Puyang Red Cross Blood Center;Nanning Blood Center;Management Committee,Chinese Society of Blood Transfusion(CSBT),Practice Comparison of Blood Transfusion Services in China)
出处 《中国输血杂志》 CAS 2018年第9期974-977,共4页 Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
关键词 执业比对 献血不良反应 血液监测系统 献血者服务 comparison of practice donor complication investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献67

  • 1杨帆,秦银河,董军.医疗质量评价方法的应用和展望[J].中华医院管理杂志,2005,21(3):172-174. 被引量:19
  • 2张爱钦,林燕,陈建彬.献血量、献血次数与献血反应的分析比较[J].中国输血杂志,2005,18(5):398-399. 被引量:35
  • 3胡军路,徐松群.宁波市无偿献血者献血反应调查分析[J].现代实用医学,2006,18(3):188-189. 被引量:14
  • 4Faber JC. Work of the European haemovigilance network ( EHN). Transfus Clin Biol,2004,11:2 - 10.
  • 5Debeir .1, Noel L, Aullen J, et al. The French haemovigilance system. Vox Sang, 1999,77:77 - 81.
  • 6Stainsby D, Williamson L, Jones H, et al. 6 years of short repoting - its influence on UK blood safty. Transfus Apher Sci, 2004,31: 123 - 131.
  • 7Jan - Jorqensen DK. Safety of the blood donor. Transfusion Today, 2006,68:9.
  • 8Kaplan HS, Callum JL, Rabin Fastman B, et al. The medical event reporting system for transfusion medicine :will help get the righting blood to the right patient? Transfus Med Rev,2002,16:86 -102.
  • 9Jean - Claude Faber, European haemovigilance network (EHN): organization and tasks. Transfusion Today,2006,68:10 - 13.
  • 10Fressy P, Daurat G, Duedari N, et al. Evaluation of the organization of pre and post transfusion screening of viral infection markers in blood recipients in France in 2001. Transfus Clin Biol,2005,12: 295 - 300.

共引文献81

同被引文献150

引证文献20

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部