期刊文献+

疑难案件裁决中的法律原则 被引量:4

Legal Principles in the Judgment of Difficult Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前中国正处于社会转型时期,传统的生活模式逐渐被新型行业的产生所打破,新技术的层出不穷引发社会新需求,由此给司法机关带来了诸多"疑难"问题。同时,规则的滞后性导致其无法精确地预设所有可能发生的权利义务关系,如何在裁判中有效应对疑难案件成为近年来困扰法官的一个难题。法律原则作为早已被立法机关承认和确立的弹性法律要素,无疑可以为疑难案件的解决打开一扇窗户,成为法官妥善思考和解决疑难问题的一把利器。 At present, China is in a period of social transformation. The traditional mode of life is gradually being broken by the emergence of new industries, and new technologies trigger new social demands, all of which have brought "difficult" problems to the judiciary. At the same time, the lag of legal rules makes it impossible to accurately formulate all possible rights and obligations in advance. Thus, how to deal with difficult cases in judgments has become a problem that plagues judges in recent years. As a flexible element that has long been recognized and established by the legislature, the legal principle can be a weapon for judges to properly think about and solve difficult problems.
作者 吴琦 WU Qi(School of Law,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,Guangdong,China)
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《学术探索》 2018年第11期83-87,共5页 Academic Exploration
关键词 司法裁判 疑难案件 法律原则 法律规则补充 judgment difficult case legal principle supplement to legal rules
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献30

  • 1张大松.论科学发现与科学证明关系的合理重建[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),1989,28(3):96-100. 被引量:1
  • 2[美]博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
  • 3陈兴良.许霆案的法理分析[N].人民法院报,2008-04-01(4).
  • 4H. L. A. Hart. Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals ~J3. Harvard Law Review, 1958, (4) :593 -629.
  • 5契含章.许霆案改判留下三个遗憾[N].中国证券报,2008-04-02,(5).
  • 6Abraham Kaplan. The Conduct of Inquiry : Methodology for Behavioral Science [ M ]. San Francisco : Chandler Publishing Com- pany, 1964.
  • 7Jerome Frank. Law and the Modern Mind [ M 1. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2009.
  • 8Richard A. Posner. What Do Judges and Justices Maximize [ J]. Supreme Court Economic Review, 1993, (3) :1 -41.
  • 9Joseph W. Singe. The player and the Cards: Nihilism and Legal Theory [J]. The Yale Journal, 1984, (1) :1 -70.
  • 10T. A. O. Endicott. Vagueness in Law [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2000.

共引文献40

同被引文献53

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部