期刊文献+

CEO任期、研发投入跳跃与企业绩效的关系——来自中国上市公司的经验证据 被引量:11

Relationship among CEO Tenure,R&D Investment Jump and Corporate Performance:Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于间接平衡论,以2007—2016年中国沪深两市302家上市公司为样本,研究了CEO任期对研发投入跳跃的前因影响,以及研发投入跳跃对企业长期绩效和短期绩效的后果影响。结果表明:研发投入正向跳跃对长期绩效产生积极影响,对短期绩效没有显著的积极影响;研发投入负向跳跃对短期绩效产生积极影响,对长期绩效产生消极影响;CEO任期越长,越不愿意进行研发投入正向跳跃,越愿意进行研发投入负向跳跃;技术能力正向调节CEO任期与研发投入正向跳跃的关系,负向调节CEO任期与研发投入负向跳跃的关系。 Based on the indirect equilibrium theory,this paper takes 302 listed companies in China from 2007 to 2016 as the sample to examine the antecedent impact of CEO's tenure on R&D investment and the effect of R&D investment jump on long term and shoreterm performance. The results show" as follows: R&D investment forward jump has positive effects on long term performance and has no significant positive effects on shoreterm performance;R&D investment negative jump has positive effects on shoreterm performance and negative effect on long term per formance; the longer the CEOs tenure, the less willing R&D investment is jumping forward, but it is willing to make negative jumps in R&D in vestment;technical ability regulates the relationship between CEO tenure and R&D investment forward jump positively,regulates the relation ship between CEO tenure and R&D investment negative jump negatively.
作者 李海东 王梦蕾 史寒之 Li Haidong;Wang Menglei;Shi Hanzhi(School of Management,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China)
出处 《技术经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第10期55-65,共11页 Journal of Technology Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"社会资本 文化智力 团队学习与合作创新绩效:基于资源基础理论的实证研究"(71371177)
关键词 CEO任期 研发投入跳跃 企业绩效 企业技术能力 CEO tenure R&D investment jump corporate performance corporate's technical capability
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1王化成,卢闯,李春玲.企业无形资产与未来业绩相关性研究——基于中国资本市场的经验证据[J].中国软科学,2005(10):120-124. 被引量:118
  • 2李顺才,邵凤英.区域创新系统中的知识流动障碍及其化解[J].管理学报,2006,3(1):109-112. 被引量:8
  • 3[6]Lee M, et al. Measuring R&D effectiveness in korean companies [J]. Research Technology Management, 1996(6): 19 - 25.
  • 4钱为家.2010.全球战略CSR案例报告.北京:中国经济出版社.
  • 5Aboody, D., and B. Lev. 1998. The Value Relevance of Intangibles: The Case of Software Capitalization. Journal of Accounting Research, 36 (22) : 161 - 191.
  • 6Barnett, M. L. 2007. Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsi- bility. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3) : 794 - 816.
  • 7Carrasco - Monteagudo, I. , and I. Buendia - Martinez. 2013. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Crossroad Between Changing Values, Innovation and Internationalisation. Europer- an Journal of InternationalManagement, 7 (3) : 295 - 314.
  • 8Hill, R. P., T. Ainscough, T. Shank, and D. Manullang. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investing: A Global Perspective. Journal of Busi- ness Ethics, 70 (2) : 165 - 174.
  • 9Johnstone, K. M., and J. C. Bedard. 2004. Audit Firm Portfolio Management Decisions. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (4) : 659 -690.
  • 10Luo, X., and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Val- ue. Journal of Marketing, 70 (4) : 1 - 18.

同被引文献223

引证文献11

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部