摘要
Introduction Much research has established that causal attributions differ cross culturally. A classicfinding is that Americans are prone to make fundamental attribution errors, whereas Chinese, Indians and Koreans are more likely to attend to situations (Morris peng, shweder)The proposed mechanism:implicit theories that is present in American vs. Chinese society.Because Americans are more independent, so they are more likely to see individuals as agents. While Chinese are more interdependent (markus&kitayama), so they are more likely to see holistic influences on people’s behavior.
IntroductionMuch research has established that causal attributions differ cross culturally. A classic finding is that Americans are prone to make fundamental attribution errors, whereas Chinese, Indians and Koreans are more likely to attend to situations (Morris peng, shweder)The proposed mechanism: implicit theories that is present in American vs. Chinese society. Because Americans are more independent, so they are more likely to see individuals as agents. While Chinese are more interdependent (markus & kitayama), so they are more likely to see holistic influences on people’s behavior.
出处
《留学》
2018年第22期80-81,共2页
Studying Abroad