期刊文献+

灾难性卫生支出水平及影响因素研究——基于CHARLS数据的分析 被引量:21

Study on Catastrophic Health Expenditure Level and Influencing Factors——An Analysis Based on CHARLS Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究灾难性卫生支出水平及其影响因素具有重要现实意义。本文基于2015年CHARLS全国数据,分析发现:灾难性卫生支出的发生率和因病致贫率分别为16. 5%和8. 6%,实际发生灾难性卫生支出的家庭平均将64%的非食品消费支出用于支付医疗费用;家庭规模和健康特征变量、经济特征变量、地区特征变量对家庭是否受到灾难性卫生支出具有显著性影响,家庭规模较小、健康状况较差、经济实力较弱、居住在农村地区的家庭更容易受到灾难性卫生支出的影响。为提高居民抵御灾难性卫生支出风险的能力,本文建议,应建立基于预防的重特大疾病医疗保障制度,加大对易发灾难性卫生支出风险家庭的支持,提高城乡居民特别是低收入群体的支付能力,合理确定自付医疗费用水平。 It is of great practical significance to study the level of catastrophic health expenditure and its influencing factors. The empirical analysis of the 2015 CHARLS data found that, about 16.5% of the households suffered catastrophic health expenditure, and the rate of poverty caused by catastrophic health expenditure was 8.6% , the households who actually suffered catastrophic health expenditure spend an average of 64% of their non -living expenses on medical expenses. Household size and health characteristic variables, economic characteristic variables and regional characteristic variables have significant influence. In order to improve the capacity of preventing the occurrence of catastrophic health expenditure, the paper puts forward four suggestions, including the establishment of a security system for serious illness based on prevention, the increased support for households prone to catastrophic health expenditure, the improvement of the income level especially the low - income groups, and the rational determination of the self - paid medical expenses.
作者 徐文娟 褚福灵 XU Wenjuan;CHU Fuling
出处 《社会保障研究》 CSSCI 2018年第5期64-72,共9页 Social Security Studies
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"医保费用科学分配及有效监控技术方法研究"成果
关键词 灾难性卫生支出 发生率 影响因素 catastrophic health expenditure incidence rate influencing factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1李茹,郑小华.城镇职工医疗保险对医疗卫生服务的利用及费用影响[J].中国卫生事业管理,2006,22(8):473-475. 被引量:8
  • 2Martin G, Myfanwy M. Access to Health Care[M]. London: Poutledge, 2003.
  • 3Clark DW. Dimensions of the concept of access to health care[J]. Bull N Y Acad Med, 1983, 59(1): 5-8.
  • 4Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter[J]. Health Soc Behav, 1995, 36(1): 1-10.
  • 5Marco C, Sabine K. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2008, 22(1): 31-72.
  • 6World Health Organization (2000) . The World Health Report2000. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • 7Murray CJL, Knaul F. Musgrove P, Xu K. Defining and measuring fairness in financial contribution to the health system. Geneva. World Health Organization (GPE discussion paper24).
  • 8World Bank Report ( No. 19940) . Chile Health Insurance Issues Old Age and Catastrophic Health Costs. Argentins. Chile aad Uruguay Country Management Unit. Latia America and the Caribbean Region.
  • 9Kei kawabata, Ke xu, Guy carrin. Prevent impoverishment through protection againstcatastrophic health expenditure. Geneva. Bulletion of the world health organization 2002, (8) :80.
  • 102008年第四次国家卫生服务调查分析报告[DB/OL].http://www.nhfpc.govcn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/s8211/201009/49165.shtml.

共引文献75

同被引文献236

引证文献21

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部