摘要
通过梳理历代本草学著作,对党参的古今差异及其药效认识的历史演化过程进行了细致的探讨和系统的整理。在探讨古今差异时,发现二者并非同一药物,在功效以及用法上也有较大的差异。在整理药效演化时,发现党参最初在《本经逢原》《本草从新》中,功效一为清肺,二为补脾。后世医家大体上认可这两个观点,基本上确定了党参的药用方向,即"补脾益肺,生津止渴"。此后,党参药性逐渐归纳为:治脾胃虚弱,气血两亏,体倦无力,食少,口渴,久泻,脱肛。这些其实都归于"补脾益肺,生津止渴"之功。
Through the combing of the ancient herbal works,the article first discussed the differences between the ancient and the modern differences,followed by the historical evolution of the performance of Codonopsis pilosula process.In discussing the differences between ancient and modern,the authors pointed out that the two are not the same medicine,the efficacy and usage are quite different.In terms of the evolution of finishing performance,Codonopsis pilosula initially passed through the " Ben Jing Feng Yuan" and " Ben Cao Cong Xin".Efficacy two disagreements,one for the lungs,the other for the spleen.Later physicians generally merge the two views,basically laid the Codonopsis medicinal direction,called " Nourishing spleen and lungs and make body fluid to prevent thirst." Since then,the performance of Codonopsis pilosula is gradually summarized as follows:treating weak in spleen and stomach,lack in qi and blood,body fatigue,appetite recession,thirsty,prolonged diarrhea,anal spondylolisthesis.In fact,these are out of effect of " Nourishing spleen and lungs and make body fluid to prevent thirst."
作者
景定坤
Jing Dingkun(College of Pharmacy,Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Dalian 116600,China)
出处
《亚太传统医药》
2018年第11期92-94,共3页
Asia-Pacific Traditional Medicine
基金
大学生创新创业计划大赛(201710162000006)
关键词
党参
古今辨析
药效
Codonopsis Pilosula
Analysis of Ancient and Modern
Performance