期刊文献+

《广雅》中的语义范畴扩展对体验性假说验证

The Proof of Embodied Hypothesis from the Semantic Category Expansion in Guangya
原文传递
导出
摘要 在体验性假说的框架下研究《广雅》中意义范畴扩展的两种机制——隐喻和转喻。此项研究对选取989个古汉字作为语料,验证隐喻和转喻在语义扩展中的基础性作用,以及确定哪种机制作用更基本,并希望其研究结果能证明体验性假说。通过分析解决了以上的问题,证实了体验性假说。 This paper studies two systems of semantic category expansion in Guangya,metaphor and meton-ymy under the frame of embodied hypothesis. Nine hundred eighty-nine Chinese characters in Guangya are chosen as the linguistic corpus. The study has the following aims,verifying the fundamental function of metaphor and met-onymy in semantic category expansion,establishing which one is more essential,and expecting the bodied hypoth-esis confirmed. Finally,the study resolves the problems and supports the embodied hypothesis.
作者 何建容
出处 《长春理工大学学报(高教版)》 2008年第3期154-157,共4页 Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology
关键词 体验性假说 语意范畴扩展 隐喻 转喻 embodied hypothesis semantic category expansion metaphor metonymy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献33

  • 1杜文礼.语言的象似性探微[J].外国语文,1996,21(1):60-65. 被引量:119
  • 2沈家煊.句法的象似性问题[J].外语教学与研究,1993,25(1):2-8. 被引量:743
  • 3戴浩一,叶蜚声.以认知为基础的汉语功能语法刍议(上)[J].当代语言学,1990(4):21-27. 被引量:163
  • 4王寅,1999,《论语言符号象似性--对索绪尔任意说的挑战与补充》[M].北京:新华出版社.
  • 5Bolinger, 1977. Meaning and Form [M]. London:Longman.
  • 6Chafe, L. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 7Derrida, J. 1982. Margins of Philosophy [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 8Dixon, R. M.W. 1982. Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? [M]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • 9Givón: T. 1989. Mind, Code and Context [M]. Hillsadale, NJ: Academic Press.
  • 10Givón: T. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction [M]. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

共引文献423

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部