期刊文献+

食品安全事件背景下网络口碑影响消费者购买决策的机制研究 被引量:8

Internet Word of Mouth Impact on Consumers' Purchase Decision under the Background of Food Safety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以农产品为例,基于武汉市消费者调查数据,综合运用实验法、Bootstrapping分析方法,分析在食品安全事件的影响下网络口碑对消费者农产品购买意愿的影响。结果表明,负面网络口碑通过消费者矛盾态度负向影响消费者对农产品的购买意愿,理(感)性负面网络口碑会导致较高(低)的矛盾态度;企业反应调节了消费者矛盾态度,当企业面对感(理)性负面网络口碑时,相对于重建(弱化)策略,企业采取弱化(重建)策略可以显著降低消费者矛盾态度。建议我国农业企业在发生食品安全事件后,关注网络负面口碑及消费者矛盾心理,努力降低消费者矛盾态度,提高购买意愿。 Based on the survey data from consumers in Wuhan city and the methods of experiment and bootstrapping,this paper analyzes the effect of Internet word-of-mouth on consumers' purchase intention on agricultural products under the influence of food safety events.The results show that negative comments online influence consumers' purchase decision reversely through the contradictory attitude of consumers,rational type(perceptual type)of negative comments online leads to higher(lower)contradictory attitude of consumers;the enterprises' response could regulator con-sumer ambivalent attitude.When faced with the rational type(perceptual type)of negative comments online,enterprises could take the weakening(reconstruction)strategy,compared with the reconstruction(weakening)strategy,to significantly reduce consumers' ambivalent attitude.It is suggested that Chinese agricultural enterprises attach importance to the negative comments online and consumers' contradictory psychology in case of food safety incidents,and endeavor to eliminate consumers' uncertain attitude and improve their purchasing intention.
出处 《华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期69-74,共6页 Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目"农产品伤害事件的外溢效应对产业集体品牌资产的损害与品牌补救研究"(71073064) 国家自然科学基金面上项目"农产品伤害危机的网络外溢效应 公共危机事件演化机理与社会应急管理研究"(71273106) 国家自然科学基金国际合作项目"作物营养强化对改善人口营养健康影响及评估研究"(71561147001)
关键词 食品安全 负面网络口碑 消费者矛盾态度 消费者购买决策 企业反应 food safety negative IWOM consumers' contradictory attitude consumers' purchase decision enterprise reaction
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献77

  • 1Aaker, J., Drolet, A., & Griffin, D. (2008). Recalling Mixed Emotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 268-278.
  • 2Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1421-1432.
  • 3Armitage, C. J., Povey, R., & Arden, M. A. (2003). Evidence for discontinuity patterns across the stages of change: A role for attitudinal ambivalence. Psychology and Health, 18, 373-386.
  • 4Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
  • 5Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (2002). Ambivalence and response amplification: A motivational perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1143-1152.
  • 6Bettman, L R., Lute, M. F., and Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187-217.
  • 7Breekler, S. J. (1994). A comparison of numerical indexes for measuring attitudinal ambivalence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 350-365.
  • 8Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J, A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition, Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
  • 9Cavazza, N., & Butebra, F. (2008). Bending without breaking:Examining the role of attitudinal ambivalence in resisting persuasive communication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1-15.
  • 10Cervellon, M. C. (2005). Ambivalent and dual attitudes: Attitude Conflicts and their impact on decision making behavior. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Unpublished.

共引文献381

引证文献8

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部