试论铃木虎雄对曹丕文论评价的合理性

Trying Talking about the Reasonable Comments of Cao Pi's Literary Theory Made by Mr.Suzuki Torao

铃木虎雄先生在《中国古代文艺论史》中说:"(关于曹丕)我们最满意他的是他提出了文学有无穷的生命。"这里的"文学"在曹丕的《典论·论文》中特指"文章"。从理论上说,铃木虎雄先生作为一名国外学者,在评价中国文学的时候,就相当于一位"旁观者",其观点理应更为客观。本文从铃木虎雄先生对曹丕文论的这句评价出发,通过深入解读曹丕关于"文学价值"的观点形成的原因及影响,分析这个评价的合理性。

＂What we are most satisfied with Cao Pi is that he proposed that literature has infinite life＂, said Mr. Suzuki Torao in his Historyof Ancient Chinese Literature. The ＂literature＂ here specifically refers to the ＂article＂ in the Literary Essay of Cao Pi. Theoretically, Mr.Suzuki, asa foreign scholar, is a ＂spectator＂ in the evaluation of Chinese literature, and his views should be more objective. So, this paperstarts from the comment of Cao Pi＇s literary theory made by Mr.Suzuki Torao , and analyzes the rationality of this evaluation by deeply un-derstanding the reasons and influence of Cao Pi＇s views on the formation of ＂literary value＂.