摘要
景观规划设计从业人员似乎并不会利用其他领域已有的知识与科研成果,同时,他们开展的研究往往直接涉及其他学科领域,但其成果却无法和相关领域的科研人员竞争。造成这一现象的核心原因是景观规划设计实践与现代科研的错位,即"整体与解构""要素与功能"以及"图示与文字"的差异。本文提出了解决这些错位的两种重要的途径与方法,包括发现与分析问题以及归纳与图示化科研成果。
Practitioners in the fietds of landscape planning and design seem less taking advantage of, or even paying no attention to, existing findings of scientific research in other discipl.ines; and, they often conduct so-called "transdisciplinary" study on their own, but most of the outcomes are uncompetitive with those proven research findings in relevant fields. The author bel.ieved that it is essentially resulted from several, dislocations between I.andscape practice and modern scientific research, that are, the gaps between holism and deconstruction, elements and functions, as well as graphics and texts. To bridge such gaps, this article puts forward two solutions: one is problem-finding and -addressing, and the other is synthesizing and visualization of research resul.ts, particularly through graphicat interpretation.
作者
王志芳
汪默英(整理)
田乐(译)
黄延峰(译)
WANG Zhifang(Associate Professor of College of Architecture and Landscape,Peking University)WANG Moying Tina TIAN HUANG Yanfen)
出处
《景观设计学(中英文)》
CSCD
2018年第5期66-71,共6页
Landscape Architecture Frontiers
关键词
科研实践界面
规划设计
实践研究
错位
interface between Research and Practice
Planning and Design
PracticeResearch
Dislocation