云南省区域旅游经济发展差异的时空格局演变

Temporal and spatial evolution of regional tourism economy development in Yunnan Province,China

以云南省16个州市为研究单元,综合运用标准差、变异系数、旅游经济发展水平梯度及泰尔指数等定量研究方法,对2000—2016年云南省区域旅游经济发展差异特征及演变趋势进行分析。研究发现:云南省国内及入境旅游经济均呈现绝对差异加速增大、相对差异缓慢缩小的态势。国内及入境旅游经济地带内差异总体呈波动下降态势,滇南、滇中及滇东内部差异变化是造成其差异变化的主要原因;地带间差异与总差异变化趋势基本一致,呈现明显的阶段性特征。国内旅游经济发展的"趋同俱乐部"现象明显,入境旅游经济发展的"极化效应"显著,国内及入境旅游经济发展均经历了由"双极核心"到"多极核心"的演变过程。影响省域地级市间国内旅游经济发展差异变化的主要因素是旅游资源禀赋、交通通达性及旅游服务设施;入境旅游经济发展差异变化受旅游资源禀赋及旅游服务设施影响较大,交通通达性及区域经济发展水平对入境旅游经济发展差异变化影响不显著。

Taking 16 states and quantitative research methods of cities in Yunnan Province as the research unit, and using the the standard deviation, coefficient of variation, gradient and Tell index reflecting tourism economy development level, the regional tourism economic development in Yunnan province from 2000 to 2016 in differences feature and evolution tendency are analyzed. The study found that both domestic and inbound tourism economy of Yunnan Province showed a trend of increasing absolute differences and decreasing relative differences. The differences in the domestic and inbound tourism economic zones are generally in the downward trend, and the differences in the southern Yunnan, central and East Yunnan are the main reasons for the differences. The phenomenon of ‘converging club ’ in the development of domestic tourism economy is obvious, the ‘polarization effect ’ of the economic development of inbound tourism is remarkable, and the development of domestic and inbound tourism economic development has experienced the evolution process from ‘bipolar core ’ to ‘multi pole core ’. The main factors affecting the economic development differences between the provincial local cities are tourism resources endowment, traffic accessibility and tourism service facilities, and the differences in economic development of inbound tourism are greatly influenced by tourism resource endowment and tourism service faciliti inbound tourism economy. es T traffic accessibility and regional economic development level on e influence of development difference change is not significant.