期刊文献+

内界膜剥除术并发症的研究 被引量:1

Study on complications of internal limiting membrane peeling
原文传递
导出
摘要 内界膜剥除术现已广泛应用于玻璃体视网膜疾病,如特发性黄斑裂孔、黄斑前膜、黄斑水肿、外伤性视网膜病变、视网膜劈裂、视盘小凹等的治疗中,尤其是黄斑部疾病。由于对内界膜的生理功能的重视,目前对于上述疾病玻璃体切除术中内界膜是否剥除、剥除的面积及方式等仍然存在争议。已有文献报道内界膜剥除主要并发症有:对内层视网膜结构的影响,对视网膜及脉络膜血流的影响,对视网膜电活动的影响,染色剂潜在的视网膜毒性,黄斑区解剖结构的改变,视野改变和对视力的潜在损害。因此,该文对黄斑裂孔及黄斑前膜手术治疗中内界膜剥除术的并发症进行综述。 Internal limiting membrane peeling is now widely used in the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases, such as idiopathic macular hole, epiretinal membrane, macular edema, traumatic retinopathy, retinoschisis, and optic pit, especially macular diseases. Due to the attention paid to the physiological function of the internal limiting membrane, there is still controversies about whether the internal limiting membrane is removed, and the area and the way of the removal in vitrectomy of the above diseases. Major complications have been reported in literature: effects on internal retinal structure, retinal and choroidal blood flow, retinal electrical activity, potential retinal toxicity of stain, changes in the anatomy of macular area, changes in visual field and potential damage to vision. In this paper, we reviewes the complications of internal limiting membrane peeling in the treatment of macular hole and epiretinal macular membrane.
作者 覃玲 张明 QIN Ling;ZHANG Ming(Department of Ophthalmology,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610041,P.R.China)
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2018年第11期1428-1432,共5页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 内界膜剥除术 并发症 争议 黄斑裂孔 黄斑前膜 Internal limiting membrane peeling Complication Controversy Macular hole Epiretinal membranes
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献69

  • 1Gass JD. Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole[ J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1995,119 : 752 - 759.
  • 2Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes:results of a pilot study [ J ]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1991,109: 654 - 659.
  • 3Thompson JT, Smiddy WE, Glaser BE, et al. Intraocular tamponade duration and success of macular hole surgery [ J ]. Retina, 1996,16:373 -382.
  • 4Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D ,et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:Is blinding necessary [ J ]. Control Clin Trials, 1996,17 ( 1 ) : 1 - 12.
  • 5Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al. Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses [ J]. Lancet, 1998,352 (9128) :609 - 613.
  • 6Kwok AK, Lai TY, Wong VW. Idiopathic macular hole surgery in Chinese patients: a randomised study to compare indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling with no internal limiting membrane peeling[ J]. Hong Kong Med J,2005,11 (4) : 259 - 266.
  • 7Mori M, Terasaki H, Ito Y, et al. Foveal shape after idiopathic maeular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane removal[ J]. Retina ,2003,23 (6) :870 - 872.
  • 8Terasaki H, Miyake Y, Nomura R, et al. Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery [ J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ,2001,42 (1) :929 -234.
  • 9Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Cisiecki S, et al. Correlation between foveal structure and visual outcome following macular hole surgery:a spectral optical coherence tomography study [ J ]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2008,246(6 ) :823 -830.
  • 10Thapa R, Paudyal G. Idiopathic epiretinal membrane in young patient:a rare case presentation[ J]. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc, 2013,52 : 524-527.

共引文献25

同被引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部