期刊文献+

金黄色葡萄球菌医院感染和社区感染分布及耐药性对比分析 被引量:14

Distribution and drug resistance of Staphylococcus aureus strains causing nosocomial infection and community-acquired infection:a comparative study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨某院患者医院感染和社区感染金黄色葡萄球菌分布及耐药率对比,为临床预防和治疗金黄色葡萄球菌感染提供科学依据。方法本研究回顾性分析2015年5月-2017年5月本院检出的82例金黄色葡萄球菌感染住院患者的临床资料,根据患者感染的来源将患者分为医院感染组56例和社区感染组26例,比较两组患者金黄色葡萄球菌的标本来源、感染部位分布及对不同抗菌药物的耐药率。结果共17 322例患者进行病原菌培养,其中金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者82例,感染率为0.47%,其中医院感染组56例,占68.29%,社区感染组26例,占31.71%。两组患者的金黄色葡萄球菌感染的感染部位的差异均无统计学意义,两组患者均以呼吸系统感染为主。两组患者检出的金黄色葡萄球菌对青霉素、苯唑西林、阿莫西林的耐药率均较高,且差异无统计学意义,医院感染组对利福平、四环素、庆大霉素、复方新诺明、环丙沙星、莫西沙星的耐药率均高于社区感染组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者检出的金黄色葡萄球菌对万古霉素、达福普汀、替加霉素、利奈唑胺、替考拉宁均100%敏感。结论金黄色葡萄球菌感染部位主要是呼吸系统,医院感染金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药率高于社区感染金黄色葡萄球菌,在制定临床治疗方案时,要区别治疗医院感染和社区感染金黄色葡萄球菌,对预防和治疗金黄色葡萄球菌感染具有重要意义。 OBJECTIVE To explore the distribution and drug resistance rates of Staphylococcus aureus strains causing nosocomial infection and community-acquired infection so as to provide guidance for clinical prevention and treatment of S.aureus infection.METHODS The clinical data of 82 patients with S.aureus infection who were hospitalized from May 2015 to May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed,the enrolled patients were divided into the nosocomial infection group with 56 cases and the community-acquired infection group with 26 cases according to the source of infection.The specimens sources,infection sites and drug resistance rates were observed and compared between the two groups of patients.RESULTS Of totally 17322 patients for whom the culture of pathogens was performed,82 had S.aureus infection,with the infection rate 0.47%;there were 56(68.29%)cases of S.aureus infection in the nosocomial infection group and 26(31.71%)in the community-acquired infection group.There were no significant differences in the sites of S.aureus infection between the two groups.The patients with respiratory tract infection were dominant among the two groups of patients.The S.aureus strains isolated from the two groups of patients were highly resistant to penicillin,oxacillin and amoxicillin,and there were no significant differences.The drug resistance rates of the strains isolated from the nosocomial infection group to rifampin,tetracycline,gentamicin,cotrimoxazole,ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin were higher than those of the strains isolated from the community-acquired infection,and there were significant differences(P〈0.05).The drug susceptibility rates of the S.aureus strains isolated from the two groups of patients to vancomycin,dalfopristin,tegafur,linezolid and teicoplanin were 100%.CONCLUSION The respiratory tract is the major infection site of the patients with S.aureus infection.The drug resistance rate of the S.aureus strains causing nosocomial infection is higher than that of the strains causing community-acquired infection.It is of great significance to distinguish the nosocomial infection and the community-acquired infection caused by the S.aureus when the clinical treatment programs are formulated so as to prevent and treat the S.aureus infection.
作者 江唯波 蒋泓宇 应晟 韩洁 韩贤达 刘金红 JIANG Wei-bo;JIANG Hong-yu;YING Sheng;HAN Jie;HAN Xian-da;LIU Jin-hong(Fenghua District Ningbo People's Hospital,Ningbo,Zhejiang 315500,China)
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第21期3211-3214,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 浙江省医药卫生一般研究计划基金资助项目(2014025)
关键词 医院感染 社区感染 金黄色葡萄球菌 耐药 Nosocomial infection Community-acquired infection Staphylococcus aureus Drug resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献39

  • 1Harbarth S,Fankhauser C,Schrenzel J. Universal screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission and nosocomial infection in surgical patients[J].{H}JAMA:the Journal of the American Medical Association,2008,(10):1149-1157.
  • 2Suhling H,Rademacher J,Greer M. Inhaled colistin following lung transplantation in colonised cystic fibrosis patients[J].{H}European Respiratory Journal,2013,(2):542-544.
  • 3Denis O,Deplano A,Nonhoff C. In vitro activities of ceftobi-prole,tigecycline,daptomycin,and 19 other antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from a national survey of Belgian hospitals[J].{H}Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy,2006,(8):2680-2685.
  • 4赵文凯.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌暴发流行的调查研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2008,18(1):64-64. 被引量:12
  • 5Liu C, Chen ZJ, Sun Z, et al. Molecular characteristics and virulence factors in methicillin-snsceptible, resistant, andheterogeneous vancomycin-intennediate Staphylococus aureus from Central Southern China[ J]. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2015, 48 ( 5 ) : 490 - 496.
  • 6Becker RE, Bubeck Wardenburg J. Staphylococcus aureus and the skin : a longstnding and complex interaction[ J]. Skinmed, 2015, 13(2): 11!-119.
  • 7Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [ S ]. Eighteenth Informa- tional Supplement, Wayne: CLSI,2010.
  • 8王蕊,赵怡鸿,黄云昆,赵云.重症监护病房耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染调查[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2008,18(2):183-185. 被引量:35
  • 9王丽春,李大江,熊中华,吕晓菊,雷秉钧.金黄色葡萄球菌医院感染的临床及耐药性分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2008,18(10):1485-1488. 被引量:72
  • 10董明驹,史莉.凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌医院感染及体外耐药监测[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2009,19(3):328-330. 被引量:28

共引文献5873

同被引文献131

引证文献14

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部