期刊文献+

贫信息情况下的应急救援路径选择模型 被引量:3

A model for emergency rescue path selection under poor information condition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为及时获取突发事件后的最优应急救援路径,首先运用Zadeh模糊算子量化路段行程速度的模糊性,引入随机动态变量表征路段行程时间的随机性,以此刻画具有模糊性与随机性的贫信息路网环境;然后结合随机一致性条件,构建该环境下的应急救援路径选择模型,再通过数学归纳法将其转化为鲁棒优化模型,并利用改进Dijkstra算法完成求解;最后用KAUFMAN路网验证模型的有效性。结果表明:基于2类不同的Zadeh模糊算子估算路段行程速度,其平均绝对误差为6. 271km/h;与传统方法相比,用鲁棒优化模型得到的应急救援路径行程时间更短;而且这种模型的算法复杂度为多项式形式,故可应用于大规模路网。 In order to obtain the best emergency rescue path on time when an emergency occurs,an emergency rescue path selection model was built according to the random consistency condition after using the Zadeh fuzzy operators to quantize the fuzziness of links' travel speed and introducing a random dynamic variable to characterize the randomness of link's travel time,which could depict a road network under poor information condition with fuzziness and randomness. The model was transformed into a robust optimization model by mathematical induction, which could be solved by the modified Dijkstra algorithm. The KAUFMAN road network was applied to validate model ' s effectiveness. The results show that the mean absolute error of links' travel speed based on 2 different fuzzy operators is 6. 271 km/h,that compared with traditional methods,a shorter time emergency rescue path can be obtained by using the robust optimal model,and that the model's algorithm complexity is expressed as a polynomial,which makes the model suitable for large gauge road networks.
作者 李彦瑾 罗霞 游云晴 LI Yanjin;LUO Xia;YOU Yunqing(School of Transportation and Logistic,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu Sicuan 610031,China;Qingyang Sub-branch,Bank of Chengdu Co.Ltd,Chengdu Sicuan 610031,China)
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第8期174-179,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(61673321) 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司科研项目(KYY2016-06)
关键词 贫信息 模糊性 随机一致性条件 鲁棒优化 数学归纳法 poor information fuzziness random consistency condition robust optimization mathematical induction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1樊治平,尤天慧,张尧.属性权重信息不完全的区间数多属性决策方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(8):798-800. 被引量:43
  • 2张毅,郭晓汾,王笑风.应急救援物资车辆运输线路的选择[J].安全与环境学报,2006,6(3):51-53. 被引量:28
  • 3席学军,邓云峰.城市地区毒气扩散事故数值模拟[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2006,2(6):35-38. 被引量:15
  • 4Gorge M. Crisis management best practice-where do we start from? [J].Computer Fraud & Security, 2006, 2006(6) : 10-13.
  • 5YI Wei, 0zdamar L. A dynamic logistics coordination model for evacuation and support in disaster response activities[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 179(3) : 1 177-1 193.
  • 6SHI Cong-ling, ZHONG Mao-hua, NONG Xing-zhong, et al. Modeling and safety strategy of passenger evacuation in a metro station in China[J].Safety Science, 2012, 50(5) : 1 319-1 332.
  • 7XIE Lian, BAO Shao-wu, Pietrafesa L J, et al. A real-time hurricane surface wind forecasting model: Formulation and verification[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2006, 134(5):1 355-1 370.
  • 8Gamba P, Casciati F. GIS and image understanding for near-real-time earthquake damage assessment[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1998, 64(10) : 987-994.
  • 9YUAN Yuan, WANG Ding-wei. Path selection model and algorithm for emergency logistics management[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56(3) : 1 081-1 094.
  • 10ZHANG Xiao-ge, ZHANG Zi-li, ZHANG Ya-juan, et al. Route selection for emergency logistics management: A bio-inspired algorithm[J]. Safety Science, 2013, 54(2): 87-91.

共引文献7

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部