期刊文献+

权变视角下沟通类型和企业间交互环境对组织绩效的影响研究 被引量:3

Research on the Effect of Communication Type and Inter-Enterprise Interaction Environment on Organizational Performance from the Perspective of Contingency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于权变的观点,使用基于偏最小二乘法的结构方程模型深入探析不同类型的沟通对组织绩效的影响,以及企业间交互环境的调节作用。研究结果表明:工具型沟通(任务相关型沟通和目标相关型沟通)和社交型沟通对组织绩效都具有积极的正向影响;企业交互环境调节了任务相关型沟通和社交型沟通对组织绩效的影响;不论在何种企业间交互环境下,采用更多的目标相关型沟通都有助于组织绩效的提高。 Based on the perspective of contingency, this study uses the structural equation model based on partial least squares (PLS) to analyze the effects of different types of communication on organizational performance and the regulatory role of the inter-enterprise interaction environment. The results show that: first, instrumental communication (task-related communication and goal-related communication) and social communication have a positive impact on organizational performance; second, the inter-enterprise interaction environment plays a regulatory role on the impact of ask-related communication and social communication on organizational performance; third, regardless of the interaction environment between enterprises, using more goal-related communication will produce enhanced organizational performance.
作者 曾伏娥 郑彤 詹志方 ZENG Fue;ZHENG Tong;ZHAN Zhifang(Wuhan University,Wuhan,China;Hunan Business School,Changsha,China)
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第10期1003-1010,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助重点项目(71832010 71532011) 国家自然科学基金资助重大研究计划培育项目(91646121) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71372129) 教育部哲学社会科学基金资助重大课题(14JZD017) 教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(14YJC630184)
关键词 工具型沟通 社交型沟通 企业间交互环境 组织绩效 instrumental communication social communication inter-enterprise interaction environment organizational performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献44

  • 1庄贵军.营销渠道控制:理论与模型[J].管理学报,2004,1(1):82-88. 被引量:63
  • 2庄贵军,席酉民.中国营销渠道中私人关系对渠道权力使用的影响[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(6):52-62. 被引量:71
  • 3孙欣,庄贵军(点评).娃哈哈:利益共享联销体[J].北大商业评论,2006(11):78-81. 被引量:1
  • 4庄贵军,席酉民,周筱莲.权力、冲突与合作——中国营销渠道中私人关系的影响作用[J].管理科学,2007,20(3):38-47. 被引量:64
  • 5Heide, J. B., 1994, "Inter-organizational Governance in Marketing Channels", Journal of Marketing, 58(Jan.), pp.71-85.
  • 6Brown, J. R., Dev, C. S. and Lee, D. J., 2000, “Managing Marketing Channel Opportunism: The Efficacy of Alternative Governance Mechanisms”, Journal of Marketing, 64(April), pp. 51-65.
  • 7Joshi, A. W. and Stump, R. L., 1999, “Transaction Cost Snalysis: Integration of Recent Refinements and an Empirical test”, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 5(4), pp.37- 71.
  • 8Skinner, S. J., Guiltinan, J. P., 1985, "Perceptions of Channel Control", Journal of Retailing, 61(4), pp.65-88.
  • 9Weitz, B. A. and Jap, S. D., 1995, "Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), pp.305-320.
  • 10Claro, D. P., Hagelaar, G. and Omta, O., 2003, “The Determinants of Relational Governance and Performance: How to Manage Business Relationships?”, Industrial Marketing Management, 32(8),pp.703-716.

共引文献82

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部