期刊文献+

竞争供应链环境下基于成本降低的流程创新选择 被引量:8

The Process Innovation of Competing Supply Chains under Cost Reduction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为降低生产成本,构建制造商是否进行流程创新的竞争供应链模型,采用Stackelberg博弈方法,以不进行流程创新为基准,识别流程创新实现供应链成员绩效改进的博弈均衡条件和占优均衡。研究发现,若创新投资系数较小,且横向竞争较弱,或者仅创新投资系数较大,则进行流程创新是实现上下游双赢的占优均衡决策。对供应链系统而言,若竞争对手不进行流程创新,则本链进行创新可实现Pareto改进,不受投资系数和竞争强度的影响;若竞争对手进行流程创新,则本链在横向竞争较弱和投资系数较小时可实现绩效改进;即使横向竞争非常激烈,提高投资系数亦可实现Pareto改进。 This study established a competing supply chain model that the manufacturer would decide whether to invest in process innovation to reduce the production cost. With the game theory of Stackelberg and the benchmarking of no innovation, it is identified that the game equilibrium conditions and dominant equilibrium of process innovation can improve the supply chain members' perform- ance. The results show that investing in process innovation is a dominant equilibrium which will realize the win-win of manufacturer and retailer when the coefficient of innovation investment is relatively small and the competition is relatively weak, or when the coefficient of innovation investment is rela- tively large and no matter how the intensity of competition is. If the competitor doesn't invest in the process innovation, the manufacturer in this supply chain investing in the process innovation will con- tribute the Pareto improvement to the whole supply chain system, which is not affected by the intensity of competitionand coefficient of innovation investment. However, if the competitor invests in the process innovation, the process innovation with relatively small investment coefficient in this supply chain will improve the performance of the whole supply chain when horizontal competition is relatively weak. What is more, even when the horizontal competition is very fierce, the manufacturer can realize Pareto improvement of the whole supply chain system by investing in process innovation with larger investment coefficient.
作者 赵海霞 艾兴政 ZHAO Haixia;AI Xingzhenga(Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu,China;Sichuan Oil and Natural Gas Development Research Center,Chengdu,China;University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu,China)
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第10期1072-1080,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助重点项目(71531003) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71372140) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(15YJC630186) 四川省软科学研究计划资助项目(2015ZR0067) 四川循环经济研究中心资助项目(XHJJ-1822) 西南石油大学青年教师科研资助项目(201499010051)
关键词 竞争供应链 成本降低 流程创新 博弈均衡 competing supply chains cost reduction process innovation game equilibriums
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献100

  • 1张池,艾兴政,唐小我.零售商力量对渠道价格影响及零售商选择[J].电子科技大学学报,2005,34(5):724-727. 被引量:5
  • 2艾兴政,唐小我,马永开.竞争供应链退货政策分析[J].电子科技大学学报,2006,35(2):279-281. 被引量:3
  • 3艾兴政,唐小我.基于讨价还价能力的竞争供应链渠道结构绩效研究[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(2):123-125. 被引量:53
  • 4Iyer G,J Mguel,A bargaining theory of distribution channel[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2003,40 (1):80 ~ 100.
  • 5McGuire W,Staelin R,An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration[J].Marketing Science,1983,2(2):161 ~ 191.
  • 6Sridhar K M,Strategic decentralization in channels,Marketing Science,1988,7(4):335 ~ 355.
  • 7Minakshi T,Distribution channels:an extension of exclusive retailership[J].Management science,1998,44 (7):896 ~ 909
  • 8Foros O, Hagen K P, Kind H J. Price-dependent profit sharing as a channel coordination device [ J ]. Management Science, 2009, 55(8) : 1280 - 1291.
  • 9Mollick A. Production smoothing in the Japanese vehicle industry [ J ]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004, 91(1) : 63 -74.
  • 10Griffin G. The process analysis alternative to statistical cost functions: An application to petroleum refining[ J]. The Ameri- can Economic Review, 1972, 62 (3) : 46 - 56.

共引文献215

同被引文献68

引证文献8

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部